"The image of the police is shaped at the cutting edge, not at the top." Discuss with reference to training and behavioural reform of subordinate police ranks.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
In 1976, Governor Mohanlal Sukhadia opened the first Sub-Inspector cadet course in Madras. He said that the image of the police depends on S.I.s, because they are the rank that deals directly with the people [1]. Constables make up 86% of state police [2], so citizens judge the state mainly by its lowest ranks. Even so, the top sets the conditions under which those ranks work.
Why the cutting edge shapes the image
- Registering FIRs, beat patrol and handling complaints happen at the station level. These decisions are often taken alone, so they rest on personal integrity. This is why Sukhadia stressed "character" and the "right attitude" [1].
- The "gap between public expectation and police performance" is felt at the station gate, not at headquarters [1].
Gaps in training of subordinate ranks
- Few personnel trained: in Bihar, only 10% of the force was trained [2].
- Shrinking budgets: spending on police training fell from ₹1,675.50 crore (2018-19) [4] to ₹1,566.85 crore (2019-20) [3].
- Neglect of soft skills: listening, empathy and fair treatment of weaker sections are still marginal in training. The Padmanabhaiah Committee (2000) and the 2nd ARC (2007) both asked for this to change [2].
Behavioural reform: the way forward
- Attitude and soft-skills modules for every rank, so that training is "functional at all levels" [1].
- A career ladder: constables are usually promoted only once and retire as head constables [2]. In the UK, officers start as constables and rise through each rank [2]. A similar path in India would reward good conduct.
But the top sets the conditions
- Overload: 5,31,737 of 26,23,225 sanctioned posts (about 20%) were vacant in 2020 [3]. The actual police-population ratio was 158.22 per lakh, against a sanctioned 198.65 (2019) [4]. Overworked personnel lose patience, however well they were trained.
- Weak accountability: no state has fully implemented the Prakash Singh (2006) directives [2]. Tamil Nadu passed its Police (Reform) Act in 2013 [5], but complaints bodies in most states still lack real power [2].
The image of the police is therefore made at the cutting edge, but the top decides whether it holds or erodes. Training that builds character must be backed by full staffing, real career prospects and complaints bodies with power. If the Prakash Singh directives and the 2nd ARC's advice are carried out, the constable can become the face of a citizen-centric state that respects the dignity promised by Article 21.
Sources
- 1"Image of Police Depends on S.I.s.", The Hindu, "50 years ago" columnSukhadia's speech; the S.I. as the face of the police; character and attitude; the expectation–performance gap; training "functional at all levels"
- 2Police Reforms in India, PRS Legislative Research (2017)86% constabulary; Bihar training figure; Padmanabhaiah/2nd ARC on soft skills; single promotion; UK comparison; *Prakash Singh* implementation
- 3BPR&D Data on Police Organisations as on 01.01.2020, PIBvacancies; training spending in 2019-20
- 4Union Home Minister releases BPR&D Data on Police Organisations as on 1.1.2019, PIBpolice-population ratio; training spending in 2018-19
- 5The Tamil Nadu Police (Reform) Act, 2013, PRSstate law to implement *Prakash Singh*