India's GIB programme has moved from conservation breeding to rewilding. Assess the role of ex-situ measures such as the 'jumpstart' technique in recovering species with slow life histories.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →The Great Indian Bustard (Ardeotis nigriceps) is Critically Endangered and listed in Schedule I of the Wildlife (Protection) Act. Only about 150 birds survive in the Thar [3]. A female matures at 3–4 years and lays one egg per season [4], so the wild population cannot recover by itself. Ex-situ measures are therefore necessary, but they work only alongside habitat protection.
Role of ex-situ measures
- Insurance population: The breeding centres at Sam and Ramdevra hold 97 birds and produced 24 chicks in 2025 and 29 in 2026 [1].
- Assisted reproduction: Artificial insemination produced 18 of the first 26 captive chicks [5]. This gets around the slow rate of natural pairing.
- Jumpstart technique: Captive-laid eggs are placed in wild nests and hatched by wild females. This produced 6 chicks in Rajasthan and 2 in Gujarat, including Gujarat's first in about a decade [1]. The chicks learn wild behaviour from their foster mothers from day one.
- Soft release: The pillar-less Rewilding Aviary at Ramdevra acclimatises birds before release [1].
Limitations
- Releases are small next to losses: WII estimated that about 18 GIBs die every year from hitting power lines [4]. Only 11 birds are earmarked for release [1].
- Birds leave the protected area: Fenced enclosures cover just 1.01% of WII's study area. Tagged birds still travel about 5.8 km a day onto farmland [4].
- Threats in the wild remain: Free-ranging dogs eat eggs and chicks, and grasslands are classed as "wastelands" and given away for other uses [4].
- Survival is unproven: The first release is officially a pilot [1].
In-situ measures that must go with it
- In M.K. Ranjitsinh v. Union of India (2025), the Supreme Court fixed a 14,013 sq km priority area in Rajasthan. It ordered 80 km of power lines to be undergrounded immediately and 250 km within two years [2].
- About 200 sq km of fenced grassland enclosures inside Desert National Park are being restored [1].
Assessment: Ex-situ tools such as jumpstart buy time for slow-breeding species, but they cannot bring about recovery alone. The National Bustard Guidelines (2013) treated captive breeding only as insurance [4]. Releases will succeed only if power-line deaths and habitat loss are reduced and local communities are involved. Publishing survival data for every released bird, together with landscape-level protection, would fulfil the duty under Article 51A(g) and advance SDG 15 (Life on Land).
Sources
- 1PIB, MoEFCC: Release of captive-bred Great Indian Bustards into the wild at Desert National Park, Jaisalmer (03 Oct 2026): captive stock, chick numbers, jumpstart results, Rewilding Aviary, pilot release, ~200 sq km enclosures
- 2Supreme Court of India, *M.K. Ranjitsinh & Ors v. Union of India*, WP(C) 838/2019, Judgment of 19 Dec 2025: revised priority area, undergrounding timelines
- 3Wildlife Institute of India: "Habitat improvement and conservation breeding of great Indian bustard: an integrated approach" (National CAMPA project): Thar population, Schedule I status
- 4WII, GIB Project Report under CAMPA (2023): breeding biology, power-line deaths, enclosure use and bird movement, dog predation, "wasteland" classification, 2013 Bustard Guidelines
- 5PIB, MoEFCC releases on GIB conservation breeding: chicks produced through artificial insemination