·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

India's prison population is dominated by undertrials drawn from marginalised groups. Analyse the socio-economic causes and examine the role of the Legal Services Authorities in addressing them.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Socio-economic causes
  2. Role of Legal Services Authorities
  3. Gaps
  4. Way forward

In 2021, 77% of India's prisoners were undertrials, held in prisons running at 130% occupancy [1]. They are in jail mainly because they are poor and unaware of their rights, not because they have been convicted. The Legal Services Authorities (LSAs), created to give effect to Article 39A, are the main remedy, but they have only partly solved the problem.

Socio-economic causes

  • Poverty and bail: the Supreme Court in Hussainara Khatoon noted that poor undertrials cannot furnish monetary bail with sureties [3]. Prisons spend more keeping undertrials in jail than the bail money needed to release them [2].
  • Legal illiteracy: many undertrials do not know they have a right to apply for bail and cannot afford a lawyer [3].
  • Vulnerable groups: NALSA lists women, the mentally ill and persons from other states as groups that need special attention [3].
  • Long trials: about 30% of undertrials had been held for over a year, and 8% for over three years [1].
  • Legal design: Section 479 BNSS denies mandatory bail to anyone facing multiple charges. Chargesheets often list several sections of law, so this shuts out many prisoners [1].

Role of Legal Services Authorities

  • Statutory right: Section 12 of the LSA Act, 1987 entitles every person in custody to free legal services [3].
  • Prison Legal Aid Clinics: NALSA's SOP-2022 requires that no prisoner is without legal representation at any stage. There are 1,256 clinics and 6,663 Jail Visiting Lawyers [3].
  • Review of eligible cases: jail lawyers and para-legal volunteers identify prisoners eligible for release and refer them to Undertrial Review Committees [3].
  • Public defenders: the Legal Aid Defence Counsel System is in place in 611 of 703 districts, with 2,406 counsels [3].

Gaps

  • A lawyer can win a bail order, but cannot pay the bail. MHA's Support to Poor Prisoners scheme has only Rs 20 crore a year and excludes NDPS, PMLA and UAPA accused [4].
  • The defence counsel system does not yet cover about 90 districts [3].

Way forward

  • Set up a fund like Andhra Pradesh's Cheyutha Nidhi in every State to pay for poor prisoners' release [2].
  • Provide a defence lawyer at the first remand hearing.
  • Apply the multiple-charge bar only to people with previous convictions, not to several charges arising from one incident.

Prolonged undertrial detention is a problem of poverty, so legal aid alone cannot fix it. LSAs have built a wide legal aid network. Pairing it with timely lawyers and money for bail would make Article 21's promise of liberty real and advance SDG 16.3's goal of equal access to justice.

Sources

  1. 1PRS Legislative Research, Legislative Brief: The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (4 Dec 2023): undertrials at 77% and occupancy at 130%; 30% held over 1 year and 8% over 3 years; the multiple-charge exclusion from mandatory bail
  2. 2PRS Report Summary: Prison – Conditions, Infrastructure and Reforms (Standing Committee on Home Affairs, 2023): holding undertrials costs more than their bail; the Cheyutha Nidhi recommendation
  3. 3Supreme Court of India, *Suhas Chakma v. Union of India*, 2024 INSC 813: the *Hussainara* observations; Section 12 of the LSA Act; NALSA SOP-2022 and its vulnerable groups; clinic and jail-lawyer numbers; Undertrial Review Committee referrals; Legal Aid Defence Counsel System coverage (611/703 districts, 2,406 counsels)
  4. 4PIB, "Support to Poor Prisoners" (MHA): Rs 20 crore a year; NCRB as nodal agency; exclusion of NDPS, PMLA and UAPA accused

More from this note