India's recent FTA push marks a shift from its earlier caution about trade agreements. Critically examine the opportunities and risks for domestic industry.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
India used to be wary of trade deals. It walked out of RCEP in 2019 because it feared a surge of cheap Chinese imports and harm to its dairy sector [1], and it sought a review of the ASEAN FTA [2]. Since 2024 it has signed deals quickly with the UK, EFTA, Oman, New Zealand and the EU [3]. This shift creates real opportunities for Indian industry, but those gains depend on whether firms can actually use the deals.
Opportunities
- Wide market access: The UK CETA gives duty-free entry to 99% of India's exports [4]. Oman offers zero duty on 98.08% of its tariff lines [3]. New Zealand removes duty on 100% of Indian exports [3].
- Gains for labour-intensive sectors: The EU FTA cuts tariffs of up to 10% to zero on about USD 33 billion of exports such as textiles, leather, marine products and gems [5]. This helps MSMEs and job creation.
- Partners that complement India: The government has chosen developed economies that do not compete with India's labour-intensive industries [3]. This lowers the risk of an RCEP-type import flood.
- Investment and services: New Zealand has committed USD 20 billion over 15 years [3]. The deals also include mobility commitments for professionals [3].
- Less dependence on the U.S.: Several markets at once spread the risk of protectionist tariff shocks.
Risks
- Low use of FTA benefits: Indian exporters have historically claimed only about 25% of available FTA preferences, against 70–80% in developed economies [6].
- Rules-of-origin burden on MSMEs: Proving origin carries fixed costs, so larger firms comply more easily than small ones [6].
- Import competition: India has opened 89.5% of its tariff lines to the UK [4]. Domestic producers of high-end goods such as autos and spirits will face more competition.
- Long time before benefits arrive: The EU deal has only been concluded [5]. Ratification will take time, so it gives no short-term cushion.
- Lessons from older FTAs: The ASEAN pact was reviewed because of trade imbalances [2], which shows that signing a deal does not guarantee gains.
On balance, the new FTAs are a more careful version of India's earlier approach rather than a break from it: they target complementary partners and protect sensitive sectors. Gains for industry will depend on digital origin certification, MSME outreach and publishing FTA-use data. With these steps, the deals can support a competitive Atmanirbhar industry that is integrated with global markets.
Sources
- 1ORF — Free Trade after RCEP: What next for India?India's RCEP exit; fears of Chinese imports and dairy competition
- 2PIB — India hosts 10th Meeting of AITIGA Joint Committee to review ASEAN–India Trade in Goods Agreementreview of the ASEAN FTA
- 3PIB — India's achievements in Free Trade Agreements for the year 2025-26Oman 98.08%, NZ 100% and USD 20 bn; choice of non-competing developed partners; mobility commitments
- 4PIB — India and UK Sign Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)99% duty-free access; India opens 89.5% of its tariff lines
- 5PIB — India–EU Free Trade Agreement Concluded: A Strategic Breakthroughnegotiations concluded; zero tariffs on about USD 33 bn of labour-intensive exports
- 6ORF — Jobs, Growth, and Market Access: Can India's FTAs Be More Inclusive?about 25% use of FTA preferences; rules-of-origin costs fall harder on smaller firms