"India's renewable energy challenge has shifted from generation to evacuation and storage." Examine this in the light of the Green Energy Corridor phases and PM-DHARA.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
India's solar and wind plants make up 37% of installed capacity but only 13% of generation [2]. The harder task now is moving clean power out of RE-rich regions and supplying it after sunset. The statement largely holds, and the Green Energy Corridor (GEC) phases trace this shift.
Why evacuation and storage are now the bottleneck
- Transmission lag: only 58% of targeted transmission lines were added in 2024-25 [2].
- Curtailment: RE output is cut when grids are congested; NITI Aayog found no transparent public data on curtailment [5].
- Intermittency: evening-peak demand arrives after solar output falls, so energy must be shifted in time.
GEC phases: building the wires
- GEC-I (intra-State): transmission lines in 8 RE-rich States [4].
- GEC-II (intra-State): ~10,750 ckm of lines for ~20 GW in 7 States, with 33% Central Financial Assistance [3].
- Outcome: 24 GW of evacuation capacity commissioned across 10 States [4].
- Storage, separately: two Viability Gap Funding (VGF) schemes back about 43 GWh of batteries [6].
PM-DHARA: wires and storage in one scheme
- Intra-State lines to evacuate up to 135 GW, plus 50 GWh BESS, by FY 2032-33 [1].
- Outlay Rs 1,86,405 crore; central support Rs 54,082 crore [1].
- TBCB for greenfield, cost-plus for brownfield; STUs implement, private developers on a BOOM model [1].
- Linked to 900 GW non-fossil capacity by 2035 [1].
Gaps that remain
- Execution: the target is over five times the 24 GW achieved [1][4]. The Standing Committee on Energy (2024) blamed delays on right-of-way, land and clearance problems [7].
- Storage scale: assuming four-hour batteries, 50 GWh gives about 12.5 GW for four hours, which is small against 135 GW.
- Finance: the central share (~29%) is below GEC-II's 33% [1][3]. The rest falls on loss-making DISCOMs through transmission charges [2].
- Markets: storage has no framework to be paid for the grid services it provides [5].
India's RE challenge has therefore moved from installing capacity to integrating it into the grid. PM-DHARA should come with uniform right-of-way compensation and a single clearance portal [7], public curtailment data, time-of-use tariffs and payments for storage [5]. It can then turn installed RE into clean power that reaches consumers, advancing SDG 7 and the 900 GW goal.
Sources
- 1Cabinet approves PM-DHARA Scheme for Development of Intra-State Transmission System with BESS, MNRE (PIB, 30 Sep 2026)135 GW, 50 GWh BESS, outlay, central support, TBCB/cost-plus, STUs/BOOM, 900 GW by 2035, FY 2032-33
- 2PRS Legislative Research, Demand for Grants 2026-27 Analysis: Power and New & Renewable Energy37% capacity vs 13% generation; 58% of targeted lines added in 2024-25; DISCOM losses
- 3Cabinet approves Intra-State Transmission System – Green Energy Corridor Phase-II (PIB)GEC-II lines, ~20 GW, 7 States, 33% CFA
- 4Renewable Energy Integration (PIB)GEC in 10 States; 24 GW evacuation capacity commissioned; GEC-I States
- 5PRS summary of NITI Aayog Report on Renewables Integration in India (2021)no public curtailment data; storage payment framework; time-of-use tariffs
- 6Government Takes Multi-Pronged Steps to Scale Up Energy Storage Capacity in the Country (PIB)two VGF schemes for about 43 GWh of BESS
- 7PRS Legislative Research, DfG Analysis 2026-27: Power (PDF)Standing Committee on Energy: right-of-way, land and clearance delays; uniform compensation; clearance portal