·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

"India's 'Special Strategic Partnership' with Israel must coexist with its commitment to peace in West Asia." Examine in light of recent political developments in Israel.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Drivers of the partnership
  2. Tensions with the peace commitment
  3. Why coexistence is still possible
  4. Way forward

In February 2026, India upgraded its ties with Israel to a "Special Strategic Partnership for Peace, Innovation & Prosperity" [1]. Israel's general election of 27 October 2026 produced a hung verdict. Netanyahu's right-religious bloc lost its majority but remains the largest group. Whether the Gaza war continues will depend on who forms the next government. That makes it harder for India to keep its partnership with Israel and its call for peace in the region in balance.

Drivers of the partnership

  • Economic architecture: The Bilateral Investment Agreement was signed in September 2025 [2], and FTA Terms of Reference and a Defence Cooperation MoU followed in November 2025 [1].
  • Long-standing ties: India and Israel established full relations in 1992. Bilateral trade was USD 6.53 bn in FY 2023-24, excluding defence [3].
  • Labour mobility: Up to 50,000 additional Indian workers may go to Israel over five years [1].

Tensions with the peace commitment

  • UN voting record: India abstained on the UNGA humanitarian-truce resolution in October 2023 [4]. It abstained again on the June 2025 ceasefire resolution, which passed 149–12–19 [5]. This sits uneasily with its stated aim of "restoring peace in West Asia" [6].
  • Diaspora risk: 6,774 workers had gone to Israel by July 2025, and about 220 returned because of skill mismatch and language barriers [7]. Expanding the scheme in a conflict zone increases these risks.
  • Political uncertainty: If a far-right coalition returns, prolonged conflict is likely. That would threaten India's energy and connectivity stakes, such as IMEC, which depend on stability in the region.

Why coexistence is still possible

  • The agreements were signed between the two states, not with a party, so they should survive a change of government in Israel.
  • India keeps parallel ties with the Arab world and supports a two-state solution.

Way forward

  • Treat the Israeli state, not a particular leader, as India's partner.
  • Use Explanations of Vote to make clear that India supports a ceasefire, the release of hostages and access for aid.
  • Link further worker deployments to the safeguards in the November 2023 Framework Agreement [7].

India's partnership with Israel and its interest in West Asian peace both depend on stability in the region. A steady policy that keeps the same approach whoever governs in Israel, together with clearer diplomatic messaging, can keep the partnership strong while India stays true to Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam and to SDG 16 (peace, justice and strong institutions).

Sources

  1. 1MEA, India–Israel Bilateral Relations brief (February 2026)Special Strategic Partnership upgrade, FTA Terms of Reference, Defence MoU, 50,000-worker arrangement
  2. 2PIB, "Government of India and Government of the State of Israel sign Bilateral Investment Agreement (BIA), in New Delhi"BIA signed September 2025
  3. 3MEA / Embassy of India Tel Aviv, India–Israel Bilateral Relations brieffull relations in 1992; USD 6.53 bn trade in FY 2023-24
  4. 4UN News, "UN General Assembly adopts Gaza resolution calling for immediate and sustained 'humanitarian truce'" (Oct 2023)October 2023 truce resolution on which India abstained
  5. 5UN News, "UN General Assembly adopts Gaza ceasefire resolution by overwhelming majority" (June 2025)149–12–19 vote; India abstained
  6. 6PIB, "Prime Minister receives a telephone call from Prime Minister Netanyahu" (22 Oct 2026)Special Strategic Partnership reaffirmed; restoring peace in West Asia
  7. 7MEA, Lok Sabha Question No. 2202: Safety of Indian Workers in Israel6,774 workers, about 220 returned, November 2023 Framework Agreement safeguards

More from this note