India's submarine fleet modernisation has been marked by delays. Analyse the causes and suggest reforms.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
The Standing Committee on Defence (2016-17) found the Navy holding 15 submarines aged 16–30 years against a planned 18 [1]. The six Project-75 Scorpenes were due by December 2017, but the last was commissioned only in January 2025 [2]. These delays come from the system itself, not from one-off mishaps.
Causes of delay
- Slow decision-making: P-75(I), for six AIP-fitted submarines, reached the RFP stage only in July 2021 under the Strategic Partnership model [3].
- Stop-gap planning: With new boats late, the Navy was left with Medium Refit Life Certification of six old submarines as the "only available option" [1].
- Foreign design dependence: The Kalvari boats are licence-built Scorpenes, with Naval Group as the foreign partner [4]. Even DRDO's indigenous AIP needs Naval Group certification before it can be integrated [5].
- Technology-integration lag: The AIP was to be fitted "soon" in 2023 [5]. It is now targeted for early 2027 [6]. The retrofit also needs a new hull section, the AIP Plug (₹1,990 crore) [7].
- Ageing fleet: 53% of naval vessels are over 15 years old [2], so each delay widens the capability gap.
- Weak cost evaluation: Parliament had to ask for a cost-benefit study of buying new boats versus refitting old ones [1].
Reforms
- Time-bound procurement: Set fixed milestones for P-75(I) from RFP to contract, with accountability for slippage.
- Design rights in contracts: Future deals should give India enough design data to modify its own hulls without a foreign certifier [4][5].
- Scale the indigenous ecosystem: Build on the DRDO–L&T–Thermax–MDL model behind the AIP [8][7]. Use its sea-trial results to decide whether P-75(I) uses Indian AIP [3].
- Plan upgrades with refits: Fit the AIP Plug during each boat's planned refit, so each boat leaves service only once.
- Transparency: Publish the cost-benefit comparison and report trial progress to the Standing Committee [1].
- Continuous production: A steady flow of orders keeps shipyard skills alive between projects.
Slow procurement, foreign designs and late technology integration have together caused these delays. Time-bound acquisition, ownership of designs and a steady indigenous production line can make the Kalvari AIP retrofit a template for P-75(I). That would give the Navy a credible undersea deterrent in the Indian Ocean and advance Aatmanirbhar Bharat in defence.
Sources
- 1Standing Committee on Defence (2016-17), Sixteenth Lok Sabha, 25th Report: 15 submarines against a planned 18, aged 16–30 years; MRLC as the only option; call for a cost-benefit study
- 2PRS Legislative Research, Demand for Grants 2025-26 Analysis: Defence: P-75 delay (due Dec 2017, last boat Jan 2025); 53% of vessels over 15 years old
- 3PIB: MoD issues RFP for construction of six P-75(I) submarines for Indian Navy (Jul 2021): RFP in July 2021, Strategic Partnership model, fuel-cell AIP
- 4PIB: The fifth Scorpene submarine of Project-75 'Vagir' launched at Mazagon Dock: Scorpene licence-build with Naval Group
- 5PIB: DRDO's Fuel Cell-based AIP system to soon be fitted onboard INS Kalvari (Jan 2023): Naval Group certification; "soon" timeline
- 6PIB: Indigenous AIP system – Setting to Work Phase-2 Activity (24 Oct 2026): integration targeted for early 2027
- 7PIB: MoD inks Rs 1,990 crore contract with MDL for construction of AIP Plug (30 Dec 2024): AIP Plug contract; MDL's role
- 8PIB: Fuel Cell based AIP System Crosses Important Milestone of User Specific Tests (Mar 2021): L&T and Thermax as industry partners
Practice
6 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.