India has a strong evidence base on food loss but weak data on food waste. Examine the implications for policy and for meeting SDG 12.3.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →SDG 12.3 has two targets for 2030: halve per capita food waste in shops and homes, and reduce food losses along supply chains [3]. India measures loss well but barely measures waste, and this tilts its policy towards the supply side.
India's evidence asymmetry
- Loss is well mapped: MoFPI has commissioned successive national studies. ICAR-CIPHET covered 45 commodities in 120 districts [2]. NABCONS (2020–22) covered 54 commodities, 15 agro-climatic zones and 292 districts [1].
- Waste is unmapped: the NABCONS study stops at wholesalers, retailers and processing units [1]. No national survey covers homes, hotels or restaurants. Yet globally, households caused 60% of the 1.05 billion tonnes of food wasted in 2022 [4].
Implications for policy
- Better-targeted supply-side spending: stage-wise data trace losses to poor handling, storage and transport [1]. This steers MoFPI schemes such as PM Kisan SAMPADA and Operation Greens towards cold chains and processing [5].
- Infrastructure gaps show up: India has about 90% of the cold storage it needs, but the transport links to distant markets remain weak [6].
- Consumption blind spot: without a waste baseline, cities and campaigns cannot set targets, fund segregation or check what works. By default, policy stays focused on supply.
- Unmeasured climate risk: people in hotter countries waste more food per head at home [4]. India's household waste may therefore be large, but it goes unmeasured.
- Ageing data: in August 2025, the Standing Committee on Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Food Processing asked for an updated post-harvest loss study [7].
Implications for SDG 12.3
- India can report the Food Loss Index (indicator 12.3.1(a)), for which FAO is the custodian agency [3].
- The Food Waste Index (12.3.1(b)), run by UNEP [8], needs measured tonnes of waste in retail, food service and households. Without a baseline, progress on "halving" cannot be tracked, and India would have to rely on modelled estimates.
India's loss surveys give it a strong base, but they cover only half of SDG 12.3. The next loss survey should report transport and market-stage losses separately for each district. MoSPI could add a household and food-service waste module based on UNEP's method [8]. Measuring both halves would let India show verified progress on responsible consumption and production by 2030.
Sources
- 1PIB – NABCONS Study Assesses Post-Harvest Losses Across 54 Crops During 2020–22 (MoFPI): coverage (54 commodities, 15 zones, 292 districts), stages assessed, causes of loss
- 2PIB – Post Harvest Food Loss (MoFPI): ICAR-CIPHET study of 45 commodities across 120 districts
- 3FAO SDG Indicators Data Portal – 12.3.1 Global food losses: wording of SDG target 12.3; Food Loss Index 12.3.1(a) with FAO as custodian
- 4UNEP press release – World squanders over 1 billion meals a day (Food Waste Index Report 2024): 1.05 billion tonnes wasted in 2022; households 60%; hotter countries waste more at home
- 5PIB – Schemes to Minimise Post-Harvest Losses (MoFPI): PM Kisan SAMPADA and Operation Greens for cold chains and processing
- 6PRS Legislative Research – Food Processing Infrastructure in India: about 90% of required cold storage available; need for logistics links
- 7PRS – Report Summary: Food Processing Sector under Make in India Program (Standing Committee, 20 Aug 2025): call for an updated post-harvest loss study
- 8UNEP – Indicator 12.3.1(b) Food Waste Index: UNEP's custody of the Food Waste Index and its measurement method
Practice
8 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.