·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Inter-ministerial coordination is often cited as a bottleneck in Indian governance. Examine how the PCIM&H–IPC collaboration offers a model for overcoming such silos, with reference to standardisation of herbal drugs.

In this answer
  1. The silo problem it addressed
  2. Mechanisms that made coordination work
  3. Wider significance

Departmentalism — where each ministry guards its own mandate — has long been flagged by the Second ARC as a barrier to coherent policy. Herbal drug standardisation illustrated this vividly: the same medicinal plant carried divergent quality parameters in the ASU&H Pharmacopoeias (Ministry of Ayush) and the Indian Pharmacopoeia (Ministry of Health & Family Welfare) [2]. The PCIM&H–IPC partnership shows how such silos can be dissolved.

The silo problem it addressed

  • Regulatory duplication: two ministries issued conflicting testing protocols and analytical methods for identical herbal drugs, confusing manufacturers and regulators alike [2].
  • Credibility deficit: divergent standards weakened consumer trust and export acceptance of traditional medicine products [1].

Mechanisms that made coordination work

  • Instrument: a renewable MoU (signed 30 August 2022, renewed 12 August 2026 for three years) rather than a statute — a low-friction, administrative route to convergence [1][2].
  • Clear authority mapping: technical content is developed jointly, but PCIM&H holds sole publication authority for harmonised monographs — removing the turf ambiguity that usually stalls joint ventures [2].
  • A shared, measurable deliverable: "One Herb, One Standard" gave both bodies a single concrete output — 50 medicinal plant monographs in phase one — instead of open-ended consultation [1].
  • Institutionalised exchange: sharing of scientific information, raw materials and joint workshops sustained cooperation beyond signing [2].

Wider significance

  • Covers Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani, Sowa-Rigpa and Homoeopathy alongside modern pharmacopoeial standards, aiding AYUSH mainstreaming in public health [1].
  • Uniform standards strengthen export competitiveness and self-reliance in herbal quality assurance [1][2].

The collaboration demonstrates that silos yield not to exhortation but to design — a defined common goal, unambiguous allocation of authority, and a time-bound reviewable instrument. Replicating this template in other overlapping domains, such as nutrition or environmental clearances, would advance cooperative governance and India's commitments under SDG-3 on health and well-being.

Sources

  1. 1PIB — "One Herb, One Standard" to Strengthen Quality and Credibility of Traditional Medicines: Union Minister Prataprao Jadhav (MoU renewal, 12 August 2026)renewal date, three-year framework, 50 monographs, systems covered, credibility and export dimension
  2. 2PIB — MoU signed between PCIM&H and IPC for Inter-Ministerial cooperation for promotion and facilitation of "One Herb, One Standard" (30 August 2022)original MoU date, divergent ASU&H and Indian Pharmacopoeia standards, PCIM&H's sole publication authority, information-exchange mechanisms

More from this note