·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Labelling versus prohibition: evaluate FSSAI's approach to analogue food products.

In this answer
  1. Merits: a naming-led restriction is the sounder instrument
  2. Limits: the rule outruns the enforcement machinery

FSSAI's draft Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition and Restrictions on Sales) Amendment Regulations, 2026 inserts a clause under Regulation 2.1.1 covering "paneer made of constituents not derived from milk" [1]. The design choice — reserve the dairy name, or ban the product — decides whether consumers gain real protection or only paper protection.

Merits: a naming-led restriction is the sounder instrument

  • It targets the actual harm — being misled about nature and composition — rather than the product itself; analogues remain available as a cheaper option for low-income buyers and small eateries [1].
  • It mirrors the Codex Alimentarius General Standard for the Use of Dairy Terms (CXS 206-1999), which permits imitation products but denies them dairy names, requiring names such as "imitation cheese" [4]. Codex-aligned rules are also easier to defend in trade disputes.
  • FSSAI has already extended this logic beyond packets: its public notice on cheese analogues directs manufacturers and food service establishments that selling analogue as "paneer" is a grave violation [2].

Limits: the rule outruns the enforcement machinery

  • Analogue paneer is indistinguishable by inspection; proof needs milk-fat versus vegetable-fat testing. Yet a CAG audit of the FSS Act's implementation found 65 of 72 state food laboratories without NABL accreditation [3] — an unaccredited report is easily contested on appeal.
  • The same audit found FSSAI had no database of food business operators and licences issued on incomplete documents in over half the cases checked [3]; sampling then becomes random rather than planned.
  • Recruitment regulations remained unframed a decade after the Act, leaving state food safety officers acutely short-staffed [3].
  • Much analogue paneer moves loose — sweet-shop counters, restaurant curries — where no label speaks.

Evaluated overall, FSSAI's calibrated middle path is correct in principle: prohibition punishes a lawful cheap food, while labelling alone protects only the packet-buyer. Its worth now depends on execution — accrediting state laboratories, building the operator database, and carrying the naming rule onto the menu card. Done so, the reform advances the consumer's right to information and India's Codex commitments.

Sources

  1. 1FSSAI — Amendments to FSS (Prohibition and Restrictions on Sales) Regulationsdraft 2026 amendment, Regulation 2.1.1, "paneer made of constituents not derived from milk", aim of preventing consumers being misled
  2. 2PIB, "FSSAI issues Public Notice on Correct Labelling of Cheese Analogues"analogue sold as paneer a grave violation; directions to manufacturers and food service establishments
  3. 3PRS Legislative Research — CAG Audit Summary, Implementation of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 200665 of 72 state labs without NABL accreditation; no database of food businesses; licences on incomplete documents in over 50% of cases; recruitment regulations unframed
  4. 4Codex Alimentarius (FAO/WHO), General Standard for the Use of Dairy Terms, CXS 206-1999substitutes must be named for their true nature and may not use dairy terms; product permitted, name reserved

More from this note