·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolity

'Mobility should not translate into disenfranchisement.' Analyse this statement in the context of internal migration and electoral roll revision processes in India.

In this answer
  1. Why mobility collides with the electoral roll
  2. The competing, legitimate demand
  3. Where the process strains due process

Census 2011 counted 45.6 crore migrants, of whom 99% moved within India [3]. Yet the franchise remains anchored to "ordinary residence", so every roll revision — presently the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) under Article 324 and Section 21(3) of the RP Act, 1950 [1] — must purify rolls without penalising those who move.

Why mobility collides with the electoral roll

  • India records about 5.4 crore inter-state migrants [3], while the EAC-PM's internal migration study puts total domestic migrants near 40 crore, much of it short-term and circular and hence poorly captured by any single enumeration [4].
  • SIR's house-to-house verification classifies non-traceable electors as Absent or Shifted; in Karnataka's SIR-2026 the draft roll carried 4.46 crore electors against 5.54 crore earlier, with roughly 1.08 crore placed in the ASDDO category [2].
  • Linking entries to a distant reference roll (2002 for Karnataka) is hardest precisely for those who have since migrated, and for the poor and elderly lacking documents [2].

The competing, legitimate demand

  • A migrant may be enrolled at both origin and destination; removing dead, duplicate and shifted entries protects "one person, one vote" and is the ECI's statutory duty [1].

Where the process strains due process

  • A compressed claims-and-objections window (24 August–23 September 2026, final roll 27 October 2026) demands physical presence from those who are, by definition, absent [2].
  • Notice asymmetry: electors flagged for discrepancies are served notices, while silently "shifted" names risk deletion without effective intimation [2].
  • In the Bihar SIR, the Supreme Court directed acceptance of Aadhaar as an additional identity document [5], signalling that verification must not become an exclusion filter.

Purification and inclusion are therefore complementary, not rival, goals. Longer objection windows, mandatory individual notice before deletion, portability of registration and progress on remote voting for migrants would let the ECI cleanse rolls while honouring Article 326's promise of universal adult franchise.

Sources

  1. 1Election Commission of India — SIR press releases and instructionsstatutory basis of SIR (Article 324, Section 21(3) RP Act 1950), house-to-house enumeration, removal of dead/duplicate entries
  2. 2Chief Electoral Officer, Karnataka — Draft Electoral Roll (SIR-2026)draft roll of 4.46 crore against 5.54 crore, ~1.08 crore ASDDO entries, 2002 reference roll, claims/objections 24 Aug–23 Sep 2026, final roll 27 Oct 2026
  3. 3PRS Legislative Research — Migration in India and the impact of the lockdown on migrantsCensus 2011 figures: 45.6 crore migrants, 99% internal, 5.4 crore inter-state
  4. 4Economic Advisory Council to the PM — *400 Million Dreams!* Internal Migration report (2024)scale and circular/short-term nature of domestic migration
  5. 5Supreme Court of India, order dated 08.09.2025 in the Bihar SIR matterdirection to accept Aadhaar as an additional identity document
Practice
11 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity