Moving from grant-based to finance-based support for R&D carries both promise and risk. Critically analyse in the Indian context.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →India spends only about 0.64% of GDP on R&D (GERD), and private firms fund roughly 36% of it. In leading innovation economies, private firms fund more than 70% [3]. The ₹1 lakh crore RDI Scheme, approved in July 2025, responds with long-term loans and refinancing at low or nil interest instead of grants [1]. This shift is a promising way to draw in private capital, but it needs safeguards.
Promise of finance-based support
- Crowding-in: support is capped at 50% of project cost, so firms must put in their own money [2].
- Self-renewing corpus: repaid loans can fund new projects. A two-tier structure routes money from a Special Purpose Fund within ANRF to professional fund managers, which keeps the government at arm's length from individual investment decisions [1].
- Bridging the "valley of death": the scheme funds projects at TRL 4 and above, which is the costly stage of moving a lab-proven idea to market [2].
- Strategic flexibility: new sectors can be added, such as advanced chemicals, petrochemicals and materials in October 2026, to cut import dependence [5].
Risks and limitations
- Penalty on failure: research often fails, and a loan must be repaid even when it does. The scheme provides no grants [2], so firms may prefer safe, near-market projects.
- Exclusion of small firms: MSMEs and startups may not be able to raise the matching 50% share.
- Basic research left out: ideas at TRL 1–3 are not eligible, so they still depend on scarce public grants.
- Slow uptake: of ₹2,000 crore sanctioned to TDB and BIRAC, only ₹500 crore had been paid out by March 2026 [4]. That is about 0.5% of the corpus.
- Crowding out: large firms may use cheap public loans to replace R&D spending they would have done anyway.
Way forward
- Build a continuum: ANRF grants for early-stage research, and RDI loans for scale-up.
- Offer equity or first-loss cover for startups, and appoint sector-specialist fund managers.
- Publish sector-wise disbursal data to make the scheme accountable.
Overall, finance-based support suits technologies close to market, while grants remain essential for high-risk basic science. A hybrid model that ties loans to additional private spending and pairs them with grants can raise private R&D. That would advance SDG 9 (industry, innovation and infrastructure) and the goal of a self-reliant, research-led Viksit Bharat.
Sources
- 1Cabinet Approves Research Development and Innovation (RDI) Scheme to scale up Research, Development and Innovation in Strategic and Sunrise Domains (PIB, July 2025)₹1 lakh crore corpus; long-term financing at low or nil interest; two-tier SPF within ANRF
- 2Research, Development, and Innovation (RDI) Cell (Department of Science and Technology)no grants; 50% project-cost cap; TRL 4+ eligibility
- 3Parliament Question: Scheme to Incentivise R&D in Private Sector (PIB)GERD about 0.64% of GDP; private share about 36% vs above 70% abroad
- 4Parliament Question: Low-Interest, Long-Term Loans/Financial Grants under RDI Scheme (PIB)₹2,000 crore sanctioned to TDB and BIRAC; ₹500 crore disbursed by March 2026
- 5Advanced Chemicals, Petrochemicals and Material Technologies Included under RDI Scheme (PIB, 14 Oct 2026)chemicals and materials added as an eligible area to reduce import dependence