Mudra loans have created a new generation of entrepreneurs. Evaluate the outcomes of PMMY beyond loan disbursement numbers.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
The Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY) was launched in 2015. It gives collateral-free loans to micro units, and the Credit Guarantee Fund for Micro Units (CGFMU) protects the lenders. By September 2026, lenders had sanctioned over 60 crore loans worth ₹43.34 lakh crore [1]. A real evaluation has to look past these totals at inclusion, firm growth and loan quality.
Positive outcomes
- Credit for people with no assets: Borrowers with no collateral and no credit history were brought into formal banking. The Cabinet called this "a whole new generation of entrepreneurs" when it extended CGFMU to March 2031 [1].
- Gender and social reach: Women hold a majority of loan accounts, and first-generation borrowers are a large share of beneficiaries [2]. This supports self-employment outside farming.
- A ladder for growth: The Tarun Plus category (₹10–20 lakh) is open only to borrowers who repaid an earlier Tarun loan. A good repayment record works as their collateral [2].
- Low cost to the government: A ₹5,000 crore corpus supports about ₹12.6 lakh crore of loans, roughly 250 times its size. The government does not have to lend directly [1].
Limitations
- Rising bad loans: For scheduled commercial banks, NPAs (loans more than 90 days overdue) on outstanding Mudra loans rose from 5.47% (2018) to 9.81% (2025). That is far above the MSME average of 3.6% [3].
- Few firms grow (missing middle): The average loan since launch is only about ₹72,000 [1]. The count is of loans, not businesses, so repeat borrowers are counted many times. Very few borrowers move up to Tarun-size loans.
- Moral hazard: Banks face disbursement targets, and the guarantee covers part of each loss. Together these can weaken screening of borrowers.
- Data gaps: Mudra NPA figures come out mainly through Parliament replies [3]. There is no regular official tracking of how many enterprises survive or how many jobs they create.
Overall, PMMY has succeeded in widening access to credit, but much less in deepening enterprise growth. Before 2031 it needs four changes:
- regular NPA data for each loan category;
- guarantee fees linked to each bank's default record;
- bank targets based on repayment, not only on lending volume;
- follow-up studies of whether borrower businesses survive.
These changes would make PMMY an engine of inclusive growth (SDG 8) rather than a disbursement scheme.
Sources
- 1Govt. extends micro credit guarantee scheme for 5 years (PTI), The Hindu, 12 Nov 2026CGFMU extended to 2031; ₹5,000 crore corpus; ₹12.6 lakh crore of loans supported; 60.36 crore loans and ₹43.34 lakh crore sanctioned; "new generation of entrepreneurs"
- 2PIB background document: 11 Years of Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (April 2026)Tarun Plus eligibility tied to repayment; women and first-time borrowers
- 3Ministry of Finance written reply in Rajya Sabha on Mudra NPAs, 19 Aug 2025NPA rate of 5.47% (2018) rising to 9.81% (2025); MSME average of 3.6%; collateral-free lending as the reason
Practice
8 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.