·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsIR

Myanmar's prolonged military rule poses multidimensional challenges for India's Act East Policy and border security. Analyse India's options.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Challenges to the Act East Policy
  2. Challenges to border security
  3. India's options

Myanmar — the only ASEAN state sharing a land border with India (1,643 km, touching Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh) [3] — is India's land bridge to Southeast Asia. Since the February 2021 coup, the State Administration Council's consolidation, the unimplemented ASEAN Five-Point Consensus and an intensifying civil war have turned that bridge into a liability, forcing India into a difficult balance between values and interests.

Challenges to the Act East Policy

  • Connectivity paralysis: the Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport Project (Sittwe–Paletwa–Zorinpui) and the India–Myanmar–Thailand Trilateral Highway pass through contested Rakhine, Chin and Sagaing territory, stalling India's flagship links to ASEAN [4].
  • Strategic displacement: with Western sanctions isolating the junta, China has deepened its patronage of both the SAC and ethnic armed organisations, narrowing India's space.
  • Diplomatic dilemma: ASEAN's non-interference principle (Charter Article 2) blunts collective pressure [2], leaving India without a multilateral cover for its own engagement.

Challenges to border security

  • Territorial fragmentation: EAOs and the People's Defence Force now control stretches abutting India, so New Delhi must deal with non-state actors, not only Naypyidaw.
  • Humanitarian spillover: about 2.8 million internally displaced within Myanmar drives refugee inflows into Mizoram and Manipur [1], straining state administrations under the Foreigners Act, 1946 with no dedicated asylum law.
  • Insurgency and trafficking: porous terrain aids northeastern insurgent sanctuaries, arms and narcotics flows — prompting scrapping of the Free Movement Regime and fencing of the full border [3].

India's options

  • Sustain pragmatic dual-track engagement — working-level contact with the SAC for border management, alongside quiet outreach to EAOs and civil society.
  • Push ASEAN-centrality: back the Five-Point Consensus rather than a unilateral posture.
  • Secure connectivity through project-specific local arrangements; pair fencing with regulated border-pass trade so kinship ties are not severed.
  • Frame a humane, calibrated refugee protocol in consultation with border states.

India's leverage lies in patience and proximity. A neighbourhood-first approach that keeps channels open with every stakeholder, protects development corridors and treats refugees with dignity will best serve both Act East ambitions and a peaceful, democratic Myanmar.

Sources

  1. 1As Crisis in Myanmar Worsens, Security Council Must Take Resolute Action… (UN Meetings Coverage, 4 April 2024)2.8 million internally displaced; 18.6 million needing humanitarian aid
  2. 2Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN Secretariat)Article 2 non-interference principle
  3. 3MHA decides to scrap the Free Movement Regime between India and Myanmar (PIB, 8 February 2024)1,643 km border, fencing decision, internal-security rationale
  4. 4India–Myanmar Bilateral Brief (Ministry of External Affairs)Kaladan Multimodal project and Trilateral Highway

More from this note

More on IR