'The natural world is indifferent to the hierarchies humans consider crucial.' Examine this statement in the context of caste and gender-based domination.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
Karthik Subbaraj's Tamil film Dorothy (2026) is set in 1990s rural Madurai. It contrasts dung beetles "guided by the cosmos" with humans who impose "systems of domination and control on one another" [1]. The statement largely holds, because caste and gender hierarchies are made by society. Nature's indifference exposes them, but it cannot by itself justify removing them.
Caste: a hierarchy made by society
- Birth-based ranking has no biological basis. Nature does not sort people by "purity". In the film, caste strains the friendship of Subbu and Karthi [1].
- Economic props: a powerful moneylender shows how credit relations reinforce caste power [1]. Human institutions keep the hierarchy alive.
- What humans made, humans can unmake: Article 17 abolishes untouchability [2]. The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 punishes caste atrocities [3].
Gender: masculinity as performance
- Fighting roosters and rams mirror male aggression [1]. Patriarchy rewards dominance as a contest and a performance.
- The same rooster is the mount of Bahuchara Mata, a goddess associated with transgender communities [1]. One bird carries two opposite meanings, so the meaning of gender comes from culture, not nature.
- Law agrees: in NALSA v. Union of India (2014), the Supreme Court upheld the right to self-identify one's gender [4]. The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 gave this legal form [5].
Limits of the statement
- Nature is not free of hierarchy. Roosters and rams fight for rank, so defenders of hierarchy can call domination "natural".
- Naturalistic fallacy: "animals have no caste, so caste is wrong" and "animals fight, so rank is right" make the same mistake from opposite sides. Neither is a sound argument.
- Folk culture cuts both ways. Cockfighting, shown as part of the Madurai landscape [1], can make aggression look attractive.
- A stronger ground is equal human dignity under Articles 14 and 21 [2]. What animals do is not the test.
Nature's indifference shows that caste and gender hierarchies are made by people, but conscience has to dismantle them. The dung beetle's cosmic compass is a reminder that society needs a moral compass of its own. That compass is constitutional morality, backed by strict enforcement of anti-atrocity and transgender-rights laws, gender-sensitive education and socially aware cinema. Together these can advance SDGs 5 and 10 and the Constitution's promise of equal dignity.
Sources
- 1"Animals as symbols of caste, masculinity and human relations in Dorothy" – Vasudevan Mukunth, The Hindu, 30 Oct 2026the film's setting, plot, moneylender, rooster and ram motifs, Bahuchara Mata, cockfighting, and the dung beetle quote
- 2Constitution of India – Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and JusticeArticles 14, 17 and 21
- 3The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 – India Codepenalties for caste atrocities
- 4National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India (2014) – Supreme Court of Indiaright to self-identify gender
- 5The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 – PRS Legislative Researchlegal recognition of transgender identity