·PIB·15 marks·250–350 wordsGeography

What are Open Natural Ecosystems? Discuss why grasslands have historically been neglected in India's conservation policy.

In this answer
  1. Understanding ONEs in the Indian context
  2. Why grasslands were historically neglected

Open Natural Ecosystems (ONEs) are naturally treeless or sparsely-treed landscapes — grasslands, savannas, scrublands, deserts and rocky plateaus — that are ancient ecosystems in their own right, not degraded forests. India's first-ever Guide to Grasslands and Other Open Natural Ecosystems, released at UNCCD CoP17, marks belated official recognition of this distinction [1].

Understanding ONEs in the Indian context

  • Spread: Himalayan and Terai grasslands, the Thar and Banni landscapes, Deccan savannas, ravines, scrublands and coastal ecosystems [1].
  • Functions: soil carbon sequestration, fire ecology, groundwater recharge, and habitat for endemic fauna such as the Great Indian Bustard, blackbuck and wolf.
  • Livelihoods: they sustain pastoralism — Rabaris, Dhangars, Maldharis — a link underlined by the UN International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists, 2026 [1].

Why grasslands were historically neglected

  • Colonial "wasteland" framing: revenue-driven land settlement treated non-forest, non-cultivated commons as unproductive, a lens that outlived colonial rule.
  • Statistical invisibility: the Wastelands Atlas of India classifies grasslands, scrub, ravines and pastures as "wastelands", making them prime candidates for plantations, solar parks and industry [2].
  • Forest-centric law: the Indian Forest Act and Wildlife (Protection) Act protect forests and species, but recognise no distinct legal category for grasslands; India has no dedicated grassland conservation policy.
  • Tree-centric restoration metrics: success measured as green cover led compensatory afforestation and plantation drives onto open lands, converting savannas rather than restoring them.
  • Ecological misdiagnosis: natural openness was read as degradation; grazing and fire were seen as damage rather than as ecological processes, marginalising pastoralists' claims.

The neglect is now being corrected: the Supreme Court in M.K. Ranjitsinh (2024) directed that remaining grasslands not be classed as wastelands and called for grassland and grazing policies [3]. Aligning restoration accounting with ecosystem type — rather than tree count — would let India meet its pledge to restore 26 million hectares by 2030 [4] without sacrificing its open ecosystems.

Sources

  1. 1India Launches First-Ever Guide to Grasslands and Other Open Natural Ecosystems at UNCCD COP17, Ulaanbaatar — PIB (17 Aug 2026)definition and spread of ONEs, thematic coverage of pastoralism and fire ecology, IYRP 2026 linkage
  2. 2Wastelands Atlas of India 2019 — Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Developmentclassification of grasslands, scrub, ravines and pastures as "wastelands"
  3. 3M.K. Ranjitsinh & Ors. v. Union of India, 2024 INSC 280 (21 March 2024) — Supreme Court of Indiadirection against classifying remaining grasslands as wastelands; call for grassland and grazing policies
  4. 4Union Minister Shri Bhupender Yadav addresses UNCCD COP15 — PIBIndia's pledge to restore 26 million hectares of degraded land by 2030

More from this note

More on Geography