"Parliamentary committees are the workhorses of Parliament, yet their use has been episodic." Examine this with reference to the recent referral of bills to Joint Parliamentary Committees.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →Parliamentary committees are small cross-party groups of MPs, often called mini-Parliaments, that examine bills in detail. The floor of the House cannot do this work. But sending a bill to a committee is at the discretion of the presiding officer or the House. As a result, referrals rise and fall with political will. The share of bills referred fell from 71% in the 15th Lok Sabha to 25% in the 16th [1] and 16% in the 17th [2]. The recent run of JPC referrals is welcome, but it is selective, not a settled practice.
Why committees are workhorses
- Sustained scrutiny: committees held about 1,700 meetings in the 17th Lok Sabha [2]. They examine bills clause by clause, which floor debate cannot do.
- Stakeholder voice: they take evidence from experts and citizens and build consensus across parties [1].
- Less partisanship: members meet in closed sittings where no whip applies, so they can deliberate freely.
Evidence of episodic use
- No mandatory referral: only four bills went to JPCs in the entire 17th Lok Sabha [2].
- Revival in the 18th Lok Sabha:
- The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024 was referred to a JPC on the day it was introduced [3].
- The One Nation One Election Bill was referred to a JPC in December 2024 [4].
-
The FCRA Amendment Bill, 2026 was referred in August 2026, almost five months after its introduction [5].
-
Reactive, not routine: referral usually happens only for contested bills. It works as a political safety valve rather than a standard step.
- Compressed scrutiny: Opposition members of the FCRA JPC have asked for at least four weeks for public comments [6]. The Bill creates a Designated Authority that can take over assets of NGOs whose registration ends [5], so the groups affected need time to respond.
- Advisory outcome: JPC reports are not binding, and the ruling majority dominates the committee.
Way forward
- Default referral: send every bill to a committee unless the government records its reasons for skipping this step.
- Consult before introduction: enforce the Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy, 2014, which asks for a 30-day public comment period on draft bills [7].
- Realistic deadlines: give committees enough time, research staff and published evidence.
Committees are Parliament's most effective scrutiny tool, but they cannot work well while their use depends on political will. Making referral a regular, rule-based step would strengthen the legislative accountability that the Constitution's parliamentary model requires.
Sources
- 1PRS Legislative Research — Functioning of 16th Lok Sabha (2014-2019): Vital Stats60%/71%/25% referral trend; committees as a consensus-building forum
- 2PRS Legislative Research — Functioning of the 17th Lok Sabha: Vital Stats16% of bills referred; ~1,700 committee meetings; four bills sent to JPCs
- 3PRS Legislative Research — The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024referred to a JPC on the day of introduction (August 8, 2024)
- 4PRS Legislative Research — The Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024One Nation One Election Bill referred to a JPC (December 19, 2024)
- 5PRS Legislative Research — The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026introduced March 25, 2026; referred to a JPC August 12, 2026; Designated Authority provision
- 6The Hindu — "Opposition members seek more time from JPC chief on FCRA Bill" (30 Sep 2026, news report)request for at least four weeks for public comments (article page could not be fetched; domain root linked)
- 7Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice — Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy, 201430-day public comment period on draft bills