PM-SETU marks a shift from government-run to industry-led vocational training. Examine how far the hub-and-spoke SPV model can address the employability deficit of ITI graduates.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →PM-SETU is a ₹60,000-crore Centrally Sponsored Scheme. It will upgrade 1,000 Government ITIs as 200 hubs and 800 spokes. Each cluster is run by an industry-majority SPV, and its anchor partner drafts the Strategic Investment Plan (SIP) [1]. The model directly targets the demand-side causes of poor employability. It does much less about the supply-side weaknesses.
How the model addresses the deficit
- Demand-led trades: anchor partners come from each region's main sector, such as ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel in Surat and Apollo Med-Skills in Hyderabad [2]. This tackles the old mismatch between what ITIs teach and what employers need.
- Industry has a financial stake: industry contributes ₹10,000 crore alongside the Centre's ₹30,000 crore and the States' ₹20,000 crore [1]. Its own money gives it a reason to place trainees.
- Hub-to-spoke spread: quality reaches rural and women's institutes, for example the Kangan and Khultabad spokes and Govt ITI Aundh (Women) [3].
- Better teaching: 3,744 trainers have been trained through NSTIs. The NSC has also pushed clusters towards ISO certification and WorldSkills-aligned trades [3].
Limits of the model
- Teacher shortage: in one state, NITI Aayog found only 14.11% of sanctioned instructor posts filled [4]. Training existing trainers does not fill vacant posts.
- Outcomes are not tracked: NITI found only 0.09% of trainees recorded as placed, the MIS out of date, and placement cells staffed by instructors [4].
- Capture by the anchor firm: one firm shapes five ITIs. The WorldSkills nudge is only advice, so trainees risk learning narrow skills suited to one employer.
- Lesson from PMKVY: CAG found only 41% of certified candidates placed, because job roles were chosen without a skill-gap analysis [5].
- Slow pace: after one year, SIPs covered only 14 of 200 clusters (₹3,446 crore) [6]. These are approvals, not money spent.
Way forward
- Make a district-wide skill-gap study mandatory in every SIP.
- States should fill sanctioned instructor posts and hire dedicated placement officers.
- Run a public dashboard of funds and outcomes for each cluster, covering money released and spent, enrolment, certification and placement.
The hub-and-spoke SPV model fixes the relevance gap in ITI training. Its employability gains will depend on teachers, data and accountability, which the State must still provide. If PM-SETU links both, it can turn India's demographic dividend into decent jobs, in line with SDG 4.4 and 8.6.
Sources
- 1PIB: MSDE invites Industry to lead Upgradation of ITIs under PM-SETU Scheme (Dec 2025): outlay, cost-sharing, hub-and-spoke design, industry-majority SPV, anchor-drafted SIP
- 2PIB: 4th NSC, ₹1,237.58 crore SIPs across Odisha, Gujarat and Telangana (Jul 2026): anchor partners by sector
- 3PIB: 6th National Steering Committee approves ₹1,194.92 crore under PM-SETU (Oct 2026): spoke ITIs, trainers trained under ToT, ISO/WorldSkills nudge
- 4NITI Aayog: Transforming Industrial Training Institutes (Jan 2023): instructor vacancies, placement records, MIS, placement cells
- 5PRS India: Summary of CAG Report on Skill Development under PMKVY: 41% placement; no skill-gap analysis
- 6PIB: PM-SETU, One Year of Transforming India's ITIs: 14 clusters, ₹3,446 crore