·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Political culture often outlives political power. Comment with reference to recent State-level transitions in India.

In this answer
  1. Evidence of continuity after a decisive transition
  2. Why culture outlives power
  3. But culture is not immutable

Political culture — the shared attitudes, habits and informal rules through which power is actually exercised — is embedded in society, whereas political power changes with every verdict. Recent State-level transitions suggest that the ballot replaces rulers far faster than it replaces the culture they leave behind.

Evidence of continuity after a decisive transition

  • West Bengal, 2026: the BJP won 207 of 294 seats, ending fifteen years of Trinamool rule [2] — a mandate built on anger against extortion, strongman politics, unemployment and youth out-migration [1].
  • Yet roughly a hundred days on, control of rent-yielding local networks — auto and e-rickshaw stands, local syndicates — reportedly passed to new claimants instead of being dismantled [1].
  • The personnel changed; the practice of informal, extra-legal local authority survived.

Why culture outlives power

  • Defection as a carrier: leaders formed inside the old system carry its methods across. Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari himself moved from the Trinamool to the BJP in 2020 [1]. The Tenth Schedule penalises switching party membership, not importing political method [3].
  • Continuity of incentives: campaign finance, local dispute settlement and welfare access still flow through intermediaries, so new incumbents inherit their usefulness.
  • Contested absorption: the reported three-way tension between the RSS, State president Samik Bhattacharya and the Chief Minister is essentially over whether to absorb or refuse these inherited networks [1].

But culture is not immutable

  • It shifts when institutions change incentives — the Second ARC's Ethics in Governance report urged decriminalisation of politics, transparency and stronger accountability machinery [4] — and where local self-government functions transparently.

Thus a transition of power is necessary but insufficient; the deeper contest is over political habit. Governments that institutionalise their mandate — through clean local governance, transparent contracting and empowered panchayat and municipal bodies — convert an anti-incumbency verdict into genuine renewal, honouring the Constitution's promise of impartial, accountable governance.

Sources

  1. 1Sayantan Ghosh, "The battle within the BJP in Bengal", The Hindu, 1 September 2026intra-party contest, patronage networks changing hands, campaign themes, Adhikari's 2020 defection
  2. 2Election Commission of India, Party-wise Result, West Bengal Assembly Election 2026BJP 207 of 294 seats
  3. 3The Constitution of India (Tenth Schedule), India Codedisqualification on ground of defection
  4. 4Second Administrative Reforms Commission, Fourth Report: Ethics in Governancerecommendations on decriminalising politics and accountability

More from this note