·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Post-harvest losses are a shared challenge of the Global South. How can India's agricultural research ecosystem contribute to food security in Africa?

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Shared nature of the challenge
  2. How India's research ecosystem can contribute
  3. Limits to factor in
  4. Way forward

In the Global South, much food is lost after it is grown: in storage, transport and processing. In Ghana, root-crop losses have been estimated at 15–30% [4]. India also loses about 4.87–11.61% of its vegetables each year [3]. The ICAR–CSIR-CRI (Ghana) MoU of October 2026 [1] shows how India's research network can tackle this shared problem.

Shared nature of the challenge

  • Smallholder-dominated, perishable crops such as tomato, cassava and yam spoil quickly.
  • Weak cold chains and little processing: India's losses come mostly from poor harvesting, handling, storage and transport [3]. The same steps fail in Africa.

How India's research ecosystem can contribute

  • Crop improvement: ICAR can share high-yielding tomato lines, germplasm and breeding material [1]. It should include lines suited to processing, not only to the fresh market.
  • Post-harvest technology: The MoU covers cold storage, refrigerated transport, sorting, grading and cassava–yam value addition [1].
  • Loss measurement: India has measured losses at scale. The NABCONS study covered 54 crops [3]. Applying the same method in Africa would give a baseline figure to judge progress against.
  • Research-to-market link: Arima Farms Ltd. is the MoU's commercial partner [1]. This goes beyond aid between governments.
  • Training: ITEC trained 164 Ghanaian civilians in 2024 [2]. Some places can be reserved for cold-chain operators and food processors.
  • Continuity: The work builds on the 2013–17 NRDC–CSIR Tomato Pilot [2].

Limits to factor in

  • India has only half-solved the problem at home. Its own vegetable losses remain high [3].
  • Bilateral bodies often fail to meet. The India–Ghana Joint Commission has never met [2]. The MoU's Joint Working Group could fall into the same pattern.
  • No results from the 2013–17 pilot are on record [2].

Way forward

  • Record a baseline loss figure before the work begins and publish the results at the end.
  • Bring in ICAR-CIPHET, ICAR's post-harvest institute, alongside the crop breeders.
  • Learn from India's Operation Greens scheme for tomato, onion and potato, and pair technology with finance for processing.

India's research network offers Africa tested crop varieties, post-harvest know-how and a habit of measuring losses. Its value will depend on measured results, not on signed MoUs. Applied this way, South-South research cooperation can advance SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) and SDG 12.3 (halving food loss) and turn India–Africa partnership into food security.

Sources

  1. 1PIB: India and Ghana Sign Historic MoU to Advance Agricultural Research, Education, and Technology Transfer (7 Oct 2026)ICAR–CSIR-CRI MoU scope, germplasm, cold chain, cassava–yam, Arima Farms, JWG
  2. 2MEA: India–Ghana Bilateral Relations Brief (June 2025)2013–17 tomato pilot, ITEC 2024 figures, Joint Commission not convened
  3. 3Open Government Data (data.gov.in): Crop/Commodity-wise Post-Harvest Losses of Agri Produce in India, 2022 (NABCONS study for MoFPI)vegetable loss range, 54-crop coverage, causes of loss
  4. 4FAO: Cassava Post-harvest Operations, Post-harvest Compendiumroot-crop losses in Ghana estimated at 15–30%

More from this note