·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

"Princely states such as Mysore were pioneers of infrastructure modernisation in colonial India." Critically examine, with reference to electrification.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Mysore as a pioneer
  2. Limits of the "pioneer" claim

In British India, infrastructure was built mainly to serve imperial trade and administration. Princely Mysore, by contrast, built its own hydroelectric station at Shivanasamudra on the Kaveri, commissioned in 1902 [2]. Mysore's record does show real pioneering, but colonial economic priorities shaped it.

Mysore as a pioneer

  • State-led hydropower: the station was a Mysore Government project, commissioned under Diwan K. Seshadri Iyer [2]. It was a renewable source run by an Indian state.
  • Long-distance transmission: power travelled about 147 km to the Kolar Gold Fields, and Bangalore received supply in 1905 [2].
  • Technical bureaucracy: by 1926 the state had a Chief Electrical Engineer to Government, whom it directed to prepare cost estimates for new supply [1]. This was an early form of project appraisal.
  • Responsive to the "Mufassal": Seringapatam (Srirangapatna), Yedatore (K.R. Nagar) and Nanjangad had petitioned for electricity. The Government acted on their requests [1].
  • Capacity-first planning: supply to these towns was planned only after the new installation at Sivasamudram was finished [1]. Generation came before wires.

Limits of the "pioneer" claim

  • Industry before people: the first large consumer was the British-run Kolar gold mines [2]. Electricity first helped extract gold for colonial capital; lighting homes came second.
  • Slow spread to the hinterland: the towns had petitioned "some years ago", but in 1926 their request was still only at the estimate stage [1].
  • Bounded autonomy: Mysore modernised under British paramountcy. Its choices often followed the needs of colonial enterprise rather than an independent development plan.
  • Not representative: Mysore was an exceptional case. Its record cannot be generalised to all princely states.
  • Lasting urban-rural gap: the hinterland gap continued long after Independence. Average rural supply was only 12.5 hours a day in 2014-15, rising to 18.5 hours by 2019-20 [3].

Mysore was a genuine but partial pioneer. It built technical capacity ahead of much of British India, but it served industrial buyers first and the "Mufassal" later. Its rule of securing generation before promising supply is still useful today. India's electrification policy should now measure reliable hours of supply, not just connections, to deliver SDG-7's goal of affordable, reliable energy for all.

Sources

  1. 1"Electric lighting for the Mufassal" (100 years ago), The Hindu, 5 Nov 2026: 1926 direction to the Chief Electrical Engineer, the three towns' petitions, dependence on the new Sivasamudram installation
  2. 2Shivanasamudra, Karnataka Tourism (Government of Karnataka): 1902 commissioning under Seshadri Iyer, transmission to the Kolar Gold Fields, Bangalore supply in 1905
  3. 3PIB, Ministry of Power: "Average Rural Power Supply Duration Increased from 12.5 Hours in 2014-15 to 18.5 Hours in 2019-20": rural supply-hours data

More from this note