·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEnvironment

A recent survey documented only 65% of historically known Odonata species in the Western Ghats. Discuss the significance of such biodiversity gaps and suggest measures to strengthen freshwater biodiversity monitoring in India.

In this answer
  1. Ecological significance
  2. Knowledge and governance significance
  3. Way forward

A 2021–2023 survey across 144 sites in five Western Ghats states recorded 143 Odonata species — 76 dragonflies and 67 damselflies — only about 65% of the ~220 historically known, leaving a 35% shortfall [1]. In a UNESCO World Heritage landscape recognised as one of the world's eight "hottest" biodiversity hotspots [2], such a gap is both an ecological warning and a governance failure.

Ecological significance

  • Odonata are obligate freshwater insects with aquatic larvae, making them bioindicators; globally 16% of the 6,016 assessed species face extinction as wetlands shrink [3].
  • Their absence signals freshwater degradation — stream channelisation, pollution, hydropower and land-use change — before larger vertebrates show stress.
  • Endemism risk is acute: 40 recorded species are Western Ghats endemics, Kerala alone accounting for 33 [1].

Knowledge and governance significance

  • Most Ghats Odonata remain "Data Deficient" or "Not Evaluated" — nearly 30% of assessed odonates worldwide are Data Deficient [3] — so absence of data is misread as absence of threat, weakening Environmental Impact Assessments.
  • Weak species-level data undermines India's reporting under the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, whose Target 3 commits to protecting 30% of land and inland waters by 2030 [4].
  • Conservation across six states makes federal coordination and the pending Western Ghats ESA notification [5] harder to ground in evidence.

Way forward

  • A national Odonata/freshwater invertebrate monitoring programme under ZSI, building on its expanding faunal database and annual survey network [6].
  • Institutionalise citizen science with expert validation, as the Ghats survey demonstrated [1].
  • Empower Biodiversity Management Committees under the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 to maintain People's Biodiversity Registers for local water bodies [7].
  • Make invertebrate baselines mandatory in EIA for hydropower and tourism projects.

Biodiversity gaps of this scale are a monitoring deficit before they are an extinction verdict. Converting the Western Ghats' bioindicator evidence into periodic, funded, standardised assessments would let India meet its 30×30 obligations while honouring the constitutional duty under Article 48A to protect forests and wildlife.

Sources

  1. 1Western Ghats Odonata Odyssey, *Biology Bulletin Reviews* (Springer Nature, 2026)143 species across 144 sites, 65% documentation rate, 40 endemics, citizen-science method
  2. 2Western Ghats — UNESCO World Heritage Centre (inscribed 2012)World Heritage status, "hottest hotspot" recognition
  3. 3Dragonflies threatened as wetlands around the world disappear — IUCN Red Listbioindicator role, 16% of 6,016 odonates threatened, Data Deficient share
  4. 4Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework — CBDTarget 3 (30×30) and species-monitoring obligations
  5. 5ESA Notifications, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate ChangeWestern Ghats Ecologically Sensitive Area notification process
  6. 6Zoological Survey of India, Annual Report 2024-25national faunal database and survey network
  7. 7Biological Diversity Act, 2002 — National Biodiversity AuthorityBiodiversity Management Committees and People's Biodiversity Registers
Practice
4 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Environment