Recurrent boat tragedies in the Gangetic plains reflect a failure of regulation rather than an absence of law. Examine with reference to the Inland Vessels Act, 2021.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →The Inland Vessels Act, 2021 replaced the century-old 1917 law [1]. Yet in 2021, boat capsizes killed 47 people in Bihar and 26 in Uttar Pradesh [3], and a capsize in Vaishali in October 2026 again claimed lives [4]. The problem lies mainly in weak regulation, along with gaps in how the law treats country boats.
What the law provides
- Motorised vessels need a certificate of survey and must be registered with a Registrar appointed by the State. Insurance is compulsory, and accidents must be reported to the police [2].
- Under Chapter XVII, States may notify minimum safety gear and prohibited stretches for rowed boats (s.94). They must set up a district welfare fund for subsidised safety equipment (s.96) [1].
- States may appoint emergency committees that can call on the navy and coast guard (s.99) [1].
Failure of regulation
- Unused discretion: the s.94 powers are "may" provisions. Where a State has not notified them, the police have nothing to enforce [1].
- Voluntary enrolment: owners of rowed boats "may" enrol (s.92) [1]. As a result, States have no full count of boats to inspect.
- Recurring pattern: Bihar recorded 74 boat-capsize cases in 2021 [3]. These are not one-off accidents, yet enforcement still follows disasters instead of preventing them.
- A global pattern: WHO notes that water transport is often unsafe because of substandard vessels and poorly enforced regulations [5].
Where the law itself falls short
- The survey, manning and insurance chapters apply only to mechanically propelled vessels (s.2) [1]. Hand-rowed ferries carrying passengers escape load-limit and crew-competence rules.
- State standards must be "in harmony with" traditional boat-building (s.94(2)) [1]. This protects livelihoods but can weaken minimum safety.
Way forward
- Notify safety gear and closed or night-time stretches under s.94. Use s.2(2) to apply the survey and crew rules to passenger-carrying rowed boats [1].
- Use the s.96 fund to provide subsidised life jackets and encourage enrolment through panchayat-level offices [1].
- Set up s.99 emergency teams before the monsoon [1]. Over time, provide all-weather roads and bridges to riverine villages.
Recurrent tragedies therefore come mainly from unused powers and weak enforcement, made worse by light-touch rules for country boats. Notifying existing provisions, encouraging enrolment and building safer connectivity can make the Act a preventive safeguard. This would uphold the right to life (Article 21) and support WHO's aim of cutting drowning deaths by 35% by 2035 [5].
Sources
- 1The Inland Vessels Act, 2021 (No. 24 of 2021), Gazette text via PRS Indiarepeal of the 1917 Act (s.114); scope limited to mechanically propelled vessels and s.2(2) extension power; s.92 optional enrolment; s.94 safety gear, prohibited stretches and harmony with tradition; s.96 welfare fund; s.99 emergency committees
- 2The Inland Vessels Bill, 2021, PRS Legislative Research Bill Tracksurvey certificate, registration with State-appointed Registrar, compulsory insurance, accident reporting to police
- 3Statistics of Inland Water Transport 2021-22, Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways (Table 6.1)2021 boat-capsize deaths: Bihar 47 (74 cases), UP 26
- 4PM expresses grief over loss of lives due to boat capsizing in Vaishali, Bihar, PMIndia (October 2026)Vaishali capsize, October 2026
- 5Global Strategy for Drowning Prevention, World Health Organizationwater transport unsafe due to substandard vessels and poorly enforced regulations; 35% drowning-reduction target by 2035