The revised Scheme of Assistance to NSFs marks a shift from event-based funding to building a high-performance ecosystem. Critically examine in the context of India's 2036 Olympic ambitions.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
The Assistance to National Sports Federations (ANSF) is a Central Sector Scheme. It has been revised for 2026-31 with ₹7,386.74 crore [1]. That is about ₹1,477 crore a year, against ₹245 crore a year in 2019-20 [3]. The new design leans towards building a sporting system. Weak capacity and governance, however, limit that shift.
Shift towards a high-performance ecosystem
- Olympic Training Centres (OTCs): each covers one sport, has sports-science equipment, and aims to cut reliance on overseas training [1].
- Support staff: the scheme funds High Performance Directors, physiotherapists, sports scientists and doctors, so it pays for systems and not only for events [1].
- Hosting capacity: up to ₹50 crore for each international event, and up to ₹50 crore for running the National Games, including Timing, Scoring and Result (TSR) services. This builds a hosting record ahead of CWG 2030 and the 2036 bid [1].
- Soft power: scholarships for the Global South, events with BRICS and BIMSTEC, and offices of international federations in India. Together these build Indian influence in global sports bodies [1].
Limitations
- Capacity deficit: about 45% of sanctioned SAI posts were vacant in 2025, up from over 37% in 2019 [2][3]. Some of the 24 National Centres of Excellence do not function [2], and new OTCs could end up the same way.
- Event bias persists: the ₹50 crore hosting grants are decided case by case by a committee headed by Secretary (Sports), with no published formula [1]. Money from the National Sports Development Fund has been diverted to other uses before, and athletes' kit and nutrition stipends have not been revised for years [2].
- Governance: most NSFs are run by non-sportspersons and lack grievance systems [3]. The National Sports Governance Act, 2025 ties funding to recognition, but this risks international bans for "interference". FIFA suspended AIFF in 2022 and wrestling's world body suspended WFI in 2023 [4].
- Federal gap: sport is on the State List, yet this money bypasses State governments [4].
Overall, the revised ANSF moves from funding events towards building systems, but people and governance still hold it back. Four steps would help:
- fill SAI vacancies before opening OTCs;
- publish a scoring formula for hosting grants;
- frame recognition rules that match the Olympic Charter;
- use the proposed State sports index to decide where OTCs go [2].
With these steps, India's 2036 bid would rest on podium-ready athletes, not just on venues.
Sources
- 1MYAS operational guidelines for the revised Scheme of Assistance to NSFs, PIB (16 Oct 2026)₹7,386.74 crore outlay; OTCs; support staff; ₹50 crore hosting and National Games grants; TSR; Global South, BRICS and BIMSTEC; case-by-case approval by the Secretary (Sports) committee
- 2PRS Report Summary: Review of functioning and performance of SAI and Khelo India (Standing Committee, Aug 2025)~45% SAI vacancies; non-functional NCOEs; NSDF diversion; unrevised stipends; State sports index
- 3PRS Demand for Grants Analysis: Youth Affairs and Sports (2019-20)₹245 crore a year for ANSF; >37% SAI vacancies; NSFs run by non-sportspersons with no grievance system
- 4PRS: The National Sports Governance Bill, 2025 — Issues for Considerationrecognition-linked funding; AIFF (2022) and WFI (2023) suspensions; sport on the State List