"Today's fertiliser shortage could become tomorrow's food crisis." Analyse how global conflicts link input supply chains with food security in the Global South.
In this answer
Food production depends on traded inputs such as fertiliser, energy and seed. At the G20 Trade Ministers' Meeting in Milwaukee (2026), India warned that "today's fertiliser shortage could become tomorrow's food crisis" [1]. Conflicts break this input chain first, and the Global South bears most of the cost.
How conflict moves from inputs to food
Conflict/sanctions → fertiliser & energy supply cut → input price spike
→ lower fertiliser use → lower yields next season → food inflation, hunger
Fig: How an input shock turns into a food shock
- Concentrated supply: Russia and Ukraine are top exporters of wheat, maize and sunflower oil, and Russia alone is a top supplier of fertiliser [2].
- Contagion through export curbs: Between Feb 2022 and Feb 2023 there were 96 export restrictions on food, feed and fertiliser, and 8 of them targeted fertiliser alone. Only about 14% were notified to the WTO [2].
- Scale: The curbs in force covered about USD 85 billion of world exports [2]. G20 economies held 44% of those still in place in October 2022 [3].
- Energy link: Natural gas is the feedstock for nitrogen fertiliser. Higher energy costs therefore raise the cost of farming itself [2].
Why the Global South is hit hardest
- Import dependence: The shock hit developing countries and LDCs in Africa, the Middle East and parts of Asia hardest [2].
- Thin fiscal buffers: Few of these countries can absorb input costs. India can, through free foodgrains for over 800 million people [1].
- Humanitarian channel at risk: Export bans threatened food aid. The WTO's MC12 therefore exempted World Food Programme purchases from export restrictions [4].
- Compounding crises: Climate-hit yields, the after-effects of COVID-19 and inflation make each shock worse [2].
Counter-trend: trade can also stabilise markets
- 62 WTO members and 2 observers cut import barriers. Food prices peaked in spring 2022 and then fell for 10 straight months [2].
- The WTO set up a food-security work programme for LDCs and net food-importing developing countries [4].
Way forward
- Transparency: Extend the G20's market-monitoring tool AMIS (launched in 2011) to fertilisers [5]. Notify export curbs to the WTO on time.
- Norms: Put into practice the G20 Statement on the Weaponization of Food, adopted by consensus [1].
- Resilience: Diversify import sources, sign long-term supply contracts and promote balanced nutrient use.
Input security is therefore food security. A rules-based trading system with the WTO at its core [1], together with diversified input supply, can stop conflicts from becoming famines and advance SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) for the Global South.
Sources
- 1PIB, "Union Minister of Commerce and Industry Shri Piyush Goyal Participates in Opening Day of G20 Trade Ministers' Meeting" (01 Oct 2026)fertiliser-shortage warning, Global South, free foodgrains for 800 million, Weaponization of Food statement, WTO-centred trading system *(the release page returned HTTP 403, so this links the PIB site root)*
- 2WTO Trade Monitoring Update, "A Year of Turbulence on Food and Fertilizers Markets" (28 Feb 2023)Russia/Ukraine supply share, 96 restrictions, 8 on fertiliser, 14% notified, USD 85 bn, regions affected, energy costs, import liberalisation, price peak
- 3WTO News, 28th Trade Monitoring Report on G20 trade measures (14 Nov 2022)44% of food, feed and fertiliser restrictions held by G20 economies
- 4WTO, Agriculture: Food SecurityMC12 WFP exemption; work programme for LDCs and NFIDCs
- 5FAO, Markets and Trade: Global Commodity MarketsAMIS launched by G20 Agriculture Ministers in 2011
Practice
8 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.