·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Traditional medicine as soft power: evaluate India's institutional efforts to integrate Ayush into mainstream and global healthcare.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Efforts to mainstream Ayush at home
  2. Efforts to globalise Ayush
  3. Gaps that limit the soft-power payoff

Soft power means drawing other countries in by attraction rather than force. For India, Ayush is such an asset. It covers six systems from Ayurveda to Sowa-Rigpa, and its services economy was worth US$36.92 bn in FY2024-25 [1]. India has built a solid set of institutions for Ayush. However, the scientific evidence and the regulation needed to make it credible are still behind that ambition.

Efforts to mainstream Ayush at home

  • A separate Ministry of AYUSH (2014) was created. The National AYUSH Mission, a Centrally Sponsored Scheme notified in 2014, expands Ayush hospitals and dispensaries and improves drug quality control [2].
  • The NCISM Act, 2020 replaced the IMCC Act, 1970. It set up a commission to regulate education and practice [3].
  • The sector supports 1.76 million livelihoods, and women make up 43% of its workforce [1]. This gives Ayush a strong jobs-and-inclusion argument.

Efforts to globalise Ayush

  • The WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre was set up at Jamnagar in 2022, backed by USD 250 million from India [4]. It places India at the centre of global standard-setting.
  • Medical Value Travel earned US$1.77 bn. Foreign patients are about 5% of patients but bring in 15–25% of hospital revenue [1].

Gaps that limit the soft-power payoff

  • Weak evidence base: WHO's Traditional Medicine Strategy 2025–2034 says integration must rest on scientific evidence and safety regulation [7].
  • Limited recognition abroad: only 78 countries regulated traditional-medicine practitioners, and only 45 covered it under insurance [6]. This limits where Ayush professionals can work and where patients can claim costs.
  • Poor data: the Parliamentary Standing Committee (2024) asked for standardised data collection and research training under the Mission [5].
  • Informality: over 1 million jobs are in standalone clinics. Wellness, the fastest-growing segment (21.29% CAGR), has little practitioner-level regulation [1][3].

Overall, India has turned Ayush from cultural heritage into an institutional and diplomatic project. The framework is strong, but its credibility is still partly unproven. Three steps would help: using GCTM to lead clinical research, certifying wellness workers, and signing mutual-recognition agreements with other countries. These could turn the projected US$216–318 bn economy of 2047 [1] into soft power that others trust, while advancing SDG 3 on universal health coverage.

Sources

  1. 1PIB – Women Account for 43% of Overall Ayush Services Workforce (RIS Ayush Service Sector Report, 2026)sector size, livelihoods, 43% women, MVT, wellness CAGR, clinic share, 2047 projection
  2. 2PIB – National AYUSH Mission (NAM)CSS notified in 2014; Ayush hospitals, dispensaries, drug quality control
  3. 3National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (NCISM)NCISM Act, 2020 replaced the IMCC Act, 1970; regulator of education and practice
  4. 4WHO – WHO establishes the Global Centre for Traditional Medicine in India (25 Mar 2022)GCTM at Jamnagar; USD 250 million support from India
  5. 5PRS Legislative Research – Review of National Ayush Mission (Standing Committee, 9 Feb 2024)standardised data collection; research training
  6. 6WHO Global Report on Traditional and Complementary Medicine 201978 countries regulate practitioners; 45 provide insurance cover
  7. 7WHO – Traditional Medicine (Questions and Answers)Strategy 2025–2034: integration must rest on evidence and regulation

More from this note