·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Traditional occupational identities are often linked with caste hierarchies. Critically examine whether welfare schemes like PM Vishwakarma reinforce or transcend such identities.

In this answer
  1. How the design can reinforce inherited identity
  2. How it transcends caste hierarchy

PM Vishwakarma, a Central Sector Scheme covering 18 traditional trades — potter, cobbler, washerman, barber, blacksmith — targets occupations historically assigned by caste [1]. Whether such targeting entrenches hierarchy or dismantles it depends less on the trade list than on whether the scheme raises returns within the occupation and permits exit from it.

How the design can reinforce inherited identity

  • Eligibility rests on being engaged in one of the 18 "family-based traditional trades" [3] — state support is conditional on continuing the ancestral occupation.
  • Every benefit is trade-locked: skilling, the ₹15,000 toolkit e-voucher and ₹3 lakh collateral-free credit [2] all deepen the same craft; no component funds diversification into another livelihood or supports the artisan's child in leaving it.
  • Exclusionary clauses narrow access: benefits are restricted to one member per family, and those who availed PMEGP, Mudra or PM SVANidhi loans in the past five years are barred [3] — shutting out the second household worker, usually the woman, and the artisan with proven enterprise.

How it transcends caste hierarchy

  • The Samman pillar — certificate and ID card — extends formal state recognition to groups long invisible to welfare delivery, treating artisanship as skilled work rather than stigmatised labour [1].
  • Credit at a concessional 5% with 8% interest subvention [2] shifts artisans from dependence on traders and moneylenders toward owning micro-enterprises — altering the terms of the work even where the work itself is inherited.
  • It is not a hereditary male preserve: women formed nearly two-fifths of registered beneficiaries by mid-2024 [4].
  • However, the emancipatory component is the weakest in practice — only about 6.19 lakh loans worth ₹5,316 crore against 30 lakh registrations [1], prompting the National Steering Committee (2025) to approve measures to improve loan sanctions and disbursements [5].

On balance, PM Vishwakarma raises dignity and income within the traditional occupation rather than reproducing caste subordination, but it offers no ladder out of it. Strengthening bank-end disbursal, relaxing the single-member cap, and linking beneficiaries' successors to Skill India's wider trades would let recognition mature into genuine occupational mobility — the constitutional promise of dignity and equality of opportunity.

Sources

  1. 1PM Vishwakarma: Strengthening Traditional Artisans and Craftspeople, PIB18 trades, Samman–Samarthya–Samriddhi pillars, 30 lakh registrations, 6.19 lakh loans worth ₹5,316 crore
  2. 2PM Vishwakarma Yojana supports artisans and craftspeople who work with their hands and tools, PIB₹15,000 toolkit e-voucher, ₹3 lakh collateral-free credit at 5% with 8% subvention
  3. 3Salient features and Guidelines of PM Vishwakarma Scheme, PIBfamily-based trade eligibility, one-member-per-family restriction, five-year exclusion of PMEGP/Mudra/SVANidhi borrowers
  4. 4Women Beneficiaries in PM Vishwakarma Scheme, PIBshare of women among registered beneficiaries
  5. 5National Steering Committee for PM Vishwakarma approves measures to improve loan sanctions and disbursements, PIBofficial acknowledgement of credit-delivery weakness

More from this note