·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolitySociety

UDISE+ 2025-26 data shows India's educational expansion has outpaced educational equity. Discuss the structural reasons for persistent regional and social disparities in access to school education.

In this answer
  1. Federal and fiscal asymmetry
  2. Infrastructural and digital divide
  3. Stage-wise and social barriers
  4. Data-governance gaps

UDISE+ 2025-26 covers 1.47 million schools, 24.72 crore students and 1.03 crore teachers, reporting falling dropout and improved stage-to-stage transition [1]. Yet these national averages conceal sharp regional and social gaps — expansion in access has clearly outrun equity in access.

Federal and fiscal asymmetry

  • Education is a Concurrent subject; delivery depends on each State's capacity to meet its matching share under Samagra Shiksha, so revenue-poor States provision less per child [3].
  • Terrain and sparse settlement in hill and north-eastern States sustain small, single-teacher schools, whose numbers fell only marginally in 2025-26 [1] — a favourable national PTR of 10-21, well below NEP 2020's 30:1 norm, therefore hides local teacher shortages [1][4].

Infrastructural and digital divide

  • Roughly one in three schools still lacks internet, and computer access remains far from universal [2], weakening NEP 2020's promise of digital equity and leaving remote and rural learners dependent on offline teaching alone [4].

Stage-wise and social barriers

  • Dropout is stage-concentrated: 1.8% at preparatory but 7.0% at secondary, with middle-to-secondary transition the weakest at 88.3% [1].
  • The RTE Act, 2009 read with Article 21A guarantees free education only for ages 6-14 [5]; secondary schooling lies outside this justiciable claim, so distance, cost and early entry into work push out SC/ST, migrant and adolescent girl learners first.

Data-governance gaps

  • Wide State-wise variation in Aadhaar seeding of student records [2] risks exclusion errors in DBT-linked scholarships and entitlements, penalising precisely the tribal and hill districts that need them most.

The disparities are thus structural — rooted in fiscal federalism, geography, the age-limits of the rights framework, and uneven digital and data capacity — not merely administrative lapses. Equity-weighted central transfers, PGI-linked accountability, and extending the RTE guarantee upward to secondary level would align school education with Article 21A's substantive promise and SDG-4.

Sources

  1. 1Union Ministry of Education Releases the Report on UDISE+ 2025-26 (PIB)coverage figures, PTR, dropout, transition rates, single-teacher schools
  2. 2UDISE+ portal, Department of School Education & Literacyschool infrastructure, internet/computer access and State-wise indicators including Aadhaar seeding
  3. 3Samagra Shiksha, Ministry of Educationcentrally sponsored financing and equity objectives in school education
  4. 4National Education Policy 202030:1 PTR norm and digital-equity goals
  5. 5Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (India Code)statutory guarantee limited to ages 6-14
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity