·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolity

Women's reservation in legislatures is contingent on a future delimitation exercise. Examine the constitutional and political challenges this linkage creates.

In this answer
  1. Constitutional challenges
  2. Political challenges

The Constitution (106th) Amendment Act, 2023 reserves one-third of seats in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies for women, but its commencement is tied to a delimitation exercise undertaken after the first Census following the Act [1]. This conditionality converts an enacted guarantee into a deferred promise, creating difficulties on both constitutional and political fronts.

Constitutional challenges

  • Deferred operation of an enacted right: the quota takes effect only after the Census (reference date 1 March 2027) is published and delimitation follows [1] — a right in the statute book but not in force.
  • Dependence on lifting the seat freeze: Article 82 requires readjustment after every Census, yet the 42nd Amendment (1976) and 84th Amendment (2001) froze inter-State allocation until the first Census after 2026 [2]. Women's reservation is thus chained to an unrelated constitutional deadline.
  • Rotation of reserved seats at every delimitation cycle may discourage sustained constituency work; panchayat experience shows about 85% of elected women were first-timers, with few re-elected once seats were de-reserved [1].
  • Amendment dependence: any decoupling itself needs a constitutional amendment, as the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026 attempted by removing the census linkage [3].

Political challenges

  • Federal contestation: redistribution on 2011 Census data would raise the share of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar while reducing that of Kerala and Tamil Nadu [2], making delimitation politically explosive — and every delay to it delays women's entry.
  • Consensus deficit: amendments under Article 368 need a special majority; the 131st Amendment Bill, along with the Delimitation Bill, 2026 [4], was negatived in the Lok Sabha on 17 April 2026 [3].

The linkage subordinates a social-justice commitment to an unsettled federal dispute, so neither advances alone. Delinking commencement from delimitation, or reallocating seats within the existing House while protecting States' relative shares, offers a negotiated path. Consensus-building of the kind that produced the 1976 and 2001 freezes can make one-third representation an early reality rather than a distant one.

Sources

  1. 1The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Eighth Amendment) Bill, 2023 — PRS Legislative Researchreservation contingent on post-Act Census and delimitation; rotation of reserved seats and panchayat re-election data
  2. 2Implications of increasing the size of the Lok Sabha — PRS Legislative Research1976/2001 freeze on inter-State seat allocation and inter-State redistribution effects of a 2011-Census basis
  3. 3The Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026 — PRS Legislative Researchproposal to decouple women's reservation from the census requirement; Bill negatived in Lok Sabha on 17 April 2026
  4. 4The Delimitation Bill, 2026 — PRS Legislative Researchcompanion Bill enabling delimitation on the latest published (2011) Census
Practice
8 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity