Zero-rating of exports is central to India's export-incentive architecture after the WTO challenge to the MEIS. Examine how RoSCTL and RoDTEP operationalise this principle.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
Zero-rating means exports should leave India free of domestic taxes. Any tax embedded in an export is either exempted or refunded. In 2019 a WTO panel (DS541) held India's MEIS to be a prohibited export subsidy [1]. India then rebuilt its export incentives on zero-rating, so they refund taxes already paid instead of rewarding exports.
The MEIS lesson: refund, not reward
- The panel found that MEIS scrips were a transfer of funds contingent on export performance, which violates SCM Agreement Articles 3.1(a) and 3.2 [1].
- Remission schemes return only embedded, unrefunded taxes. This keeps them on the right side of the subsidy line [2].
How RoSCTL operationalises zero-rating
- The Ministry of Textiles has run it since 7 March 2019 [2]. It covers apparel (ITC-HS Ch. 61, 62) and made-ups (Ch. 63) [4].
- It rebates State and Central taxes and levies not refunded by any other mechanism [2]. It works in addition to Duty Drawback, not as a replacement [5].
- The benefit comes as a Duty Credit Scrip, which can be used to pay basic Customs duty on imported machinery and inputs [5].
- In 2025–26 it reached 15,400+ exporters in 444+ districts, mostly MSMEs [3].
How RoDTEP operationalises zero-rating
- It rests on the principle that "taxes and duties should not be exported". It covers 8,555 tariff lines, and claims are fully digitised [6].
- It covers textiles outside Ch. 61–63, such as yarn and fabric. Together the two schemes span the whole textile value chain [2].
Gaps in operationalisation
- Rate calibration: the schemes are WTO-compatible only if rates match the taxes actually embedded. The RoSCTL rate review depended on industry data due by 15.04.2025 [7].
- Predictability: RoSCTL has had short extensions, to 30.09.2026 and now to 31.12.2026, while it awaits 16th Finance Commission-cycle approval [2][3]. The Cabinet itself stressed a "stable policy regime" because textile orders are placed long before delivery [4].
- Volatility: RoDTEP rates and value caps had to be restored from 23 March 2026 after West Asia trade disruption [8].
- Fragmentation: one textile chain runs on two schemes with two rate schedules.
RoSCTL and RoDTEP apply zero-rating by refunding real tax costs, the distinction MEIS lacked. Next steps: approve both for the full 16th Finance Commission cycle, publish data-backed rates and review them regularly. This would give MSME exporters stable, WTO-proof support and advance SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth).
Sources
- 1WTO — DS541: India — Export Related Measures (Panel Report circulated 31 Oct 2019)MEIS held a prohibited export subsidy under SCM Arts. 3.1(a) and 3.2
- 2PIB — Government Notifies Extension of RoSCTL Scheme for Apparel and Made-ups Exportszero-rating principle, operational since 7 March 2019, unrefunded taxes, extension to 30.09.2026 pending 16th FC approval, RoDTEP for textiles outside Ch. 61–63
- 3PIB — Ministry of Textiles extends RoSCTL Scheme till 31 December 2026 (30 Sep 2026)extension to 31.12.2026; 15,400+ exporters in 444+ districts, mostly MSMEs
- 4PIB — Cabinet approves continuation of RoSCTL for export of Apparel/Garments and Made-upsCh. 61–63 coverage; "stable policy regime" for long-lead orders
- 5PIB — Rebate of State/Central Taxes and LeviesDuty Credit Scrip for basic Customs duty; works in addition to Duty Drawback
- 6PIB — Centre Notifies RoDTEP Scheme Guidelines and Rates"taxes should not be exported" principle; 8,555 tariff lines; digitised claims
- 7PIB — Date for submission of data for review of RoSCTL rates extended up to 15.04.2025RoSCTL rate review based on industry data
- 8PIB — Government Restores RoDTEP Rates and Value Caps Amid West Asia Trade DisruptionsRoDTEP rates and value caps restored from 23 March 2026