·The Hindu

Working of factories in Bombay

In this note
  1. At a Glance
  2. Why in the News
  3. Background & Evolution
  4. Core Static Facts
  5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis
  6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)
  7. Prelims Hooks
  8. Mains Relevance
  9. Related Topics to Study Next
  10. Common Errors / Trap Areas
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

1. At a Glance

  • Colonial-era Bombay Presidency factory statistics (1925) illustrate the scale and labour composition of India's earliest industrial belt — a foundational case for the GS-I theme of colonial industrialisation and the GS-II/GS-I theme of early labour legislation (Factory Acts).
  • Bombay Presidency alone accounted for roughly one-fourth of all factories and factory operatives in India in 1925, underscoring its status as India's principal industrial hub in the interwar period [1].
  • The data trace the earliest state efforts — factory inspection reports, compulsory education, and anti-child-labour rules — that fed into subsequent Factories Acts (1881, 1891, 1911, 1922, culminating in 1948) [1][2].
  • Useful as a static/historical peg connecting colonial economic history (GS-I) with labour welfare legislation evolution (GS-II/GS-III).

2. Why in the News

  • Reprint of a 1926 archival report ("Working of Factories in Bombay") published in The Hindu's "100 Years Ago" historical column on 13 August 2026, based on the annual factory report of the Bombay Presidency for 1925 [1].
  • No new policy trigger — this is a historical/archival republication, not a contemporary policy event.

3. Background & Evolution

  • 1881 — First Indian Factories Act (under Viceroy Lord Ripon): banned employment of children below age 7; capped working hours for children (7–12 yrs) at 9 hours/day; barred children from hazardous work [2].
  • 1891 — Factories Act extended coverage to factories with 50+ workers (later widened to 20+); reduced children's working hours from 9 to 7 hours/day; introduced restrictions on women's night work and mandated rest intervals [2].
  • 1911 — Indian Factories Act, 1911 (in force from 1 July 1912): capped male adult working hours at 12/day and children's at 6/day [2].
  • 1922 — Factories Act amended: prohibited child labour below age 12; capped adult working hours at 11/day, 60/week [2].
  • 1925 (report year) — Bombay Presidency records show continued enforcement of working-condition reforms, rising employment of women, and declining child employment, attributed partly to expanding compulsory education in large towns and pending legislation penalising parents/guardians for illegal child employment [1].
  • 1948 — Culminated (post-independence) in the comprehensive Factories Act, 1948, still the governing statute for factory labour welfare in India [2].

4. Core Static Facts

Metric (Bombay Presidency, 1925) Figure
Total factories 1,460 (net increase of 115 over previous year) [1]
Share of India's total factories ~1/4 (one-fourth) [1]
Total operatives employed (1925) 370,460 (up from 354,853 in 1924) [1]
Share of India's factory workforce ~1/4 [1]
Women employed 77,624 (1925), up from 72,679 (1924) [1]
Children employed 8,460 (1925), down from 9,779 (1924) [1]
Wages Reported as "fairly steady" [1]
Drivers of falling child labour Compulsory education in large towns; pending legislation penalising parents/guardians for double-employment of children [1]
First Factories Act 1881, under Lord Ripon [2]
Minimum age for child employment (1881 Act) 7 years [2]
Child labour ban age (1922 Act) Below 12 years [2]
Governing modern statute Factories Act, 1948 [2]

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

  • Economic: Bombay Presidency's outsized share (1/4 of India's factories and workforce) reflects concentration of cotton textile and allied industry in western India during the colonial period, reinforcing the region's role as India's industrial nucleus [1].
  • Social: Rising women's factory employment (72,679 → 77,624) alongside falling child employment (9,779 → 8,460) signals an early, gradual shift in the composition of the industrial workforce and growing (if limited) state concern for child welfare [1].
  • Legal / Constitutional (historical): Sequential Factory Acts (1881→1891→1911→1922) show incremental colonial regulation of hours, age limits, and women's night work — precursors to post-independence labour codes [2].
  • Governance / Administrative: Reliance on "annual factory reports" indicates an early statistical/inspection-based regulatory mechanism — a precedent for modern labour inspection and reporting systems [1].
  • Historical: Illustrates the interplay between colonial economic exploitation (cheap women/child labour) and reformist pressure (compulsory education, penalising guardians) that shaped Indian labour jurisprudence [1][2].

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

  • Static historical topic — no recent (2024-26) policy development. The only "recent" event is the 13 August 2026 republication of the 1926 news item in The Hindu's heritage/archival column [1].

7. Prelims Hooks

  • Bombay Presidency had 1,460 factories in 1925 — roughly one-fourth of all of India's factories [1].
  • Factory operatives in Bombay Presidency rose from 354,853 (1924) to 370,460 (1925) [1].
  • Women workers in Bombay factories rose from 72,679 (1924) to 77,624 (1925) [1].
  • Child workers in Bombay factories fell from 9,779 (1924) to 8,460 (1925) [1].
  • The first Indian Factories Act was passed in 1881 under Viceroy Lord Ripon [2].
  • The 1881 Act banned employment of children below 7 years [2].
  • The 1891 Factories Act extended coverage to factories with 50+ workers and cut children's hours to 7 hours/day [2].
  • The 1911 Indian Factories Act came into force 1 July 1912, capping adult male hours at 12/day and children's at 6/day [2].
  • The 1922 amendment banned child labour below age 12 and capped adult hours at 11/day, 60/week [2].
  • The current governing statute for factories in India is the Factories Act, 1948 [2].
  • Decline in Bombay child labour (1925) was attributed to spread of compulsory education in large towns [1].
  • Pending 1925-era legislation aimed to penalise parents/guardians enabling illegal "double employment" of children [1].

8. Mains Relevance

  • GS-I — Modern Indian History: "Effects of colonialism on Indian society" / industrialisation and rise of factory-based labour in Bombay/Calcutta/Ahmedabad.
  • GS-II — Government policies/interventions for vulnerable sections (child labour, women workers); evolution of welfare legislation.
  • GS-III — Effects of liberalisation on the economy (contrast with colonial industrial base); labour reforms and Industrial Relations Code.
  • Possible question stems: 1. "Trace the evolution of factory legislation in colonial India from 1881 to 1948. How did these laws address the exploitation of women and child labour?" (GS-I/GS-II) 2. "Discuss the role of Bombay Presidency in shaping India's early industrial and labour landscape." (GS-I) 3. "Examine the socio-economic factors that contributed to the decline of child labour in colonial Indian factories in the early 20th century." (GS-I/GS-II)

9. Related Topics to Study Next

  • Factories Act, 1948 — the modern successor statute; compare provisions with colonial-era Acts.
  • Industrial Relations Code, 2020 / Labour Codes — contemporary consolidation of labour law, useful contrast with colonial fragmentary Acts.
  • Royal Commission on Labour in India (1929-31) — direct follow-up investigation into factory/labour conditions after this period.
  • Growth of cotton textile industry in Bombay and Ahmedabad — economic backdrop to these factory statistics.
  • Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 / 2016 amendment — modern child labour law lineage.
  • Compulsory Primary Education movements in colonial India (e.g., Gokhale's Bill, 1911) — linked to the education-driven fall in child labour cited in the report.
  • Trade union movement in India (AITUC, 1920) — contemporaneous labour organisation context.
  • ILO conventions on child labour and women's night work — international parallel to domestic Factory Acts.

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

  • Do not confuse the Factories Act, 1881 (first Act, Lord Ripon) with the Factories Act, 1948 (post-independence, currently governing) — aspirants often misattribute provisions across Acts.
  • The 1925 report figures (1,460 factories, 370,460 operatives) pertain specifically to Bombay Presidency, not all-India totals — don't conflate presidency-level with national figures.
  • Minimum age thresholds changed across Acts (7 yrs in 1881 → child labour banned below 12 yrs in 1922) — aspirants often mix up the exact age and year.
  • This is a colonial-era archival report, not a current government scheme — avoid treating it as an ongoing policy or confusing it with contemporary labour ministry data.
  • "Bombay Presidency" is a colonial administrative unit (covering parts of present-day Maharashtra, Gujarat, Karnataka, Sindh) — distinct from present-day Mumbai city or Maharashtra state.

Sources

  1. 1Working of factories in Bombay — The Hindu (archival reprint, 13 Aug 2026)thehindu.com · tier 4
  2. 2Factory Acts in India (1881, 1891, 1911, 1934): Evolution, Provisions, and Impact for UPSC Prelims and Mainsapproachias.com · tier 4
At the end · practice MCQs
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

Also on 13 August

All 13 August articles →