Chhattisgarh sets up panel for preparing UCC draft
In this note
Practice
11 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
1. At a Glance
- Chhattisgarh became the third BJP-ruled State to move on a Uniform Civil Code (UCC), after Uttarakhand and Gujarat. [1]
- UCC is a Directive Principle of State Policy under Article 44 of the Constitution — non-justiciable but politically salient. [1][4]
- Tests both static constitutional law (DPSPs, personal law) and current affairs (state-level UCC rollouts) — a recurring UPSC theme since Uttarakhand's 2024 Act.
- Federal dimension: UCC in India is being implemented state-by-state rather than via a central law, raising questions on legislative competence (Concurrent List — Entry 5).
2. Why in the News
- 16 April 2026 (article date): Chhattisgarh Cabinet, chaired by CM Vishnu Deo Sai, approved constitution of a high-level committee to draft a UCC for the state. [1]
- Formal government order issued by the General Administration Department on 25 June 2026, setting up a five-member panel. [2]
- Comes after Uttarakhand implemented its UCC (notified 27 January 2025) and the Gujarat Assembly passed the UCC Bill, 2026 in March 2026. [1][3]
3. Background & Evolution
- Article 44 (Directive Principle): "The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India." [1]
- 2019: Uttarakhand promised a UCC in BJP's state election manifesto; committee headed by Justice (Retd.) Ranjana Prakash Desai constituted to draft it.
- February 2024: Uttarakhand Assembly passed UCC Bill; notified into force 27 January 2025 — India's first state-level UCC. [1]
- 24–25 March 2026: Gujarat Assembly debated and passed the Uniform Civil Code Bill, 2026 (201-page legislation) by voice vote — second state. [3]
- 16 April 2026: Chhattisgarh Cabinet approves committee formation (announcement stage). [1]
- 25 June 2026: Chhattisgarh formally notifies the 5-member drafting committee. [2]
4. Core Static Facts
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Constitutional basis | Article 44, Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy) [1] |
| Chhattisgarh Committee Chair | Justice (Retd.) Ranjana Prakash Desai, former Supreme Court judge [1][2] |
| Committee size | 5 members [2] |
| Other members | Retd. IAS officers Shyamdhar Singh & M.K. Raut; senior advocate Mohan Pawar; Jyoti Rani Singh [2] |
| Nominating authority | Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai authorised to nominate members [1] |
| Venue of Cabinet decision | Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur [1] |
| Subject matters covered | Marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, maintenance, family disputes [1] |
| Stated objective | "Simplifying laws to promote religious and gender equality" [1] |
| Mechanism for public input | Consultations + dedicated web portal for feedback [1] |
| Legislative process | Draft → Cabinet approval → introduced in State Assembly [1] |
| Comparable states | Uttarakhand (implemented, Jan 2025); Gujarat (Bill passed, March 2026) [1][3] |
| Key common Gujarat UCC feature | Bans bigamy; mandates registration of live-in relationships; excludes Scheduled Tribes/protected customary groups [3] |
| Justice Desai's prior role | Also headed the Uttarakhand UCC drafting panel [2] |
5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis
Legal/Constitutional
- UCC sits in the Concurrent List (personal law, Entry 5) — states can legislate, subject to compatibility with central law and possible Presidential assent for repugnancy under Article 254.
- DPSPs (Article 44) are non-justiciable (Article 37) but courts (e.g., Sarla Mudgal, Shah Bano) have repeatedly urged UCC implementation.
- Exclusion of Scheduled Tribes from Gujarat's UCC raises questions about consistency with Article 366(25)/Fifth-Sixth Schedule protections and Article 44's "uniform" intent. [3]
Social
- Direct impact on gender equality — inheritance and maintenance rights for women, uniform divorce grounds. [1]
- Sensitive minority rights dimension — personal laws of religious communities (Muslim, Christian, tribal customary law) affected.
Administrative/Governance
- Adopts a consultative model: committee-led drafting, public feedback portal, before Assembly introduction — replicates Uttarakhand's process. [1][2]
- Reflects policy diffusion across BJP-ruled states rather than a uniform central law — federalism dimension.
Political/Ethical
- Raises debate on whether state-wise UCCs defeat the "uniform" purpose of Article 44 (patchwork of differing state codes).
- Committee composition (retd. judge, IAS officers, advocate) signals attempt at technical/legal legitimacy over purely political drafting.
6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)
- Jan 2025: Uttarakhand's UCC formally notified and enforced — India's first operational state UCC. [1]
- 24–25 March 2026: Gujarat Assembly passes UCC Bill, 2026 by voice vote, becomes second state. [3]
- 16 April 2026: Chhattisgarh Cabinet approves setting up drafting committee. [1]
- 25 June 2026: Chhattisgarh issues formal order constituting the 5-member Justice Desai-led panel. [2]
7. Prelims Hooks
- Chhattisgarh is the third BJP-ruled state to initiate UCC action, after Uttarakhand and Gujarat. [1]
- Chhattisgarh's UCC committee is chaired by Justice (Retd.) Ranjana Prakash Desai, who also headed Uttarakhand's UCC panel. [1][2]
- Chhattisgarh Cabinet's UCC decision was taken at a meeting held at Mahanadi Bhawan, chaired by CM Vishnu Deo Sai. [1]
- UCC derives from Article 44, a Directive Principle under Part IV of the Constitution. [1]
- Chhattisgarh's UCC committee is a 5-member panel, formally constituted via General Administration Department order dated 25 June 2026. [2]
- Uttarakhand was the first state to implement a UCC, notified 27 January 2025 (Bill passed February 2024). [1]
- Gujarat passed the Uniform Civil Code Bill, 2026 in the Assembly on 24–25 March 2026, becoming the second state. [3]
- Gujarat's UCC excludes Scheduled Tribes and groups with constitutionally protected customary rights. [3]
- Gujarat's UCC bans bigamy and mandates registration of live-in relationships. [3]
- Chhattisgarh's UCC committee covers: marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, maintenance, and family disputes. [1]
- The stated aim of Chhattisgarh's UCC exercise is "simplifying laws to promote religious and gender equality." [1]
- Chhattisgarh's draft UCC process: committee draft → Cabinet approval → Assembly introduction. [1]
8. Mains Relevance
- GS-II: Indian Constitution — Directive Principles of State Policy (Article 44); Federalism; Issues relating to personal laws and minority rights; comparison of fundamental rights and DPSPs.
- GS-I: Social empowerment, gender issues (women's rights in personal law matters).
- Plausible question stems: 1. "Discuss the constitutional basis of the Uniform Civil Code under Article 44. Examine whether state-level UCC enactments serve or undermine the objective of 'uniformity' envisaged by the Constitution." (GS-II) 2. "Uniform Civil Code is increasingly being pursued at the state level rather than nationally. Critically examine the implications of this trend for cooperative federalism and minority rights." (GS-II) 3. "Personal laws in India have historically been in tension with the constitutional goal of gender justice. Discuss with reference to recent state UCC initiatives." (GS-I/II)
9. Related Topics to Study Next
- Uttarakhand UCC, 2024 — first enacted state UCC; template being replicated by other states.
- Gujarat UCC Bill, 2026 — second enacted state UCC; useful for comparing provisions (bigamy ban, live-in registration, ST exclusion).
- Article 44 & Directive Principles of State Policy — constitutional foundation and justiciability debate.
- Shah Bano case (1985) & Sarla Mudgal case (1995) — judicial pronouncements pushing for UCC.
- Concurrent List, Entry 5 (personal law) — legislative competence of states vs Parliament.
- Law Commission of India reports on UCC (2018 consultation paper, 22nd Law Commission reference) — for balanced constitutional debate.
- Special Marriage Act, 1954 — existing secular alternative to religious personal laws.
- Fifth and Sixth Schedules / tribal customary law protections — relevant to ST exclusions in state UCCs.
10. Common Errors / Trap Areas
- Confusing Article 44 (UCC) with Article 43 (living wage) or Article 39 (equal pay) — all DPSPs but distinct subject matter.
- Assuming UCC is a central/Union law — currently it is being implemented state-by-state, not nationally.
- Mixing up chronology: Uttarakhand first (2024 Bill/2025 notified), Gujarat second (March 2026), Chhattisgarh third (2026, committee stage only, not yet enacted) — Chhattisgarh has NOT passed a UCC Act, only formed a drafting committee.
- Assuming Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai is a sitting judge — she is a retired Supreme Court judge.
- Overlooking that Gujarat's and typically such UCCs exclude Scheduled Tribes, contradicting the popular assumption that UCC applies uniformly to all citizens without exception.
Sources
- 1"Chhattisgarh sets up panel for preparing UCC draft" — The Hindu (16 April 2026)thehindu.com · tier 4
- 2"Chhattisgarh forms Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai-led panel to draft Uniform Civil Code"pgurus.com · tier 4
- 3"Gujarat Passes Uniform Civil Code Bill 2026: Second State After Uttarakhand To Enact UCC" — Outlook Indiaoutlookindia.com · tier 4
- 4Constitution of India, Article 44 (Directive Principles of State Policy) — referenced via search corroborationtier 3
At the end · practice MCQs
11 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.