RAF diary entry shows Delhi Police authorised pellet gun use on July 20

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

Item Detail
Force involved Rapid Action Force (RAF), a wing of CRPF
Ordering authority Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), Zone-1, Jantar Mantar
Date of incident July 20, 2026
GD entry registered July 22, 2026, 1.24 a.m., Parliament Street PS
Protest group Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) — "Sansad Chalo" march (reportedly linked to NEET paper-leak issue)
Munitions fired (per diary) 55 rounds non-electrical shell, 15 rounds electrical shell, 5 tear-smoke shells, 2 pellet (ballistic cartridge) rounds
Separate CRPF inquiry finding 7 pellet rounds fired at Connaught Place; 5 hit protesters
Post-incident action Withdrawal of shock batons, electric shields, pump-action guns, anti-riot (pellet) guns from RAF at Jantar Mantar
Oversight review RAF Inspector-General review — found "serious deficiencies"
Doctrine violated (alleged) RAF's "sensitive policing" principle
Parent ministry Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) — administrative control of CRPF/RAF

[S1][S2][S3][S4]

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Legal / Constitutional - Use of force by police/RAF for crowd control is governed by SOPs requiring weapons to be aimed below the waist; deployment authorised by an executive officer (DCP) under statutory/executive powers to manage public order. [S4] - Raises questions under Article 19(1)(b) (right to peaceful assembly) vs. reasonable restrictions under Article 19(3), and potential Article 21 concerns (right to life/dignity) if disproportionate force is used. - Denial of pellet use by Delhi Police, later contradicted by official records, raises accountability and truthfulness-in-governance concerns.

Administrative / Governance - Highlights command accountability — force was used "on orders of" a specific DCP, raising questions on delegation of use-of-force authority to a single officer. - Internal RAF Inspector-General review flagging "serious deficiencies" shows an internal oversight mechanism functioning, but post-facto rather than preventive. - Demonstrates coordination gaps between CRPF (RAF) and Delhi Police in joint law-and-order operations — RAF is a central force operating under local police direction.

Ethical / Human Rights - Pellet guns are a controversial "less-lethal" weapon — 2016 Kashmir experience showed risk of blinding and serious injury even when "non-lethal." - Case exemplifies tension between crowd control necessity and proportionality/human rights of protesters.

Historical - Draws a direct parallel to 2016 Kashmir pellet gun controversy, which led to the Expert Committee and calls for PAVA shells as alternatives — this incident reopens that unresolved policy question in a new context (Delhi, not J&K).

Social - Protesters at CJP march reportedly linked to NEET paper-leak issue, connecting this policing episode to the broader socio-political debate on examination integrity and student unrest.

6. Recent Developments (last 12–18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources