Disruptions in legislatures pose a serious challenge: LS Speaker

Legislative Disruptions in Legislatures — LS Speaker's Concern

UPSC Prelims + Mains Study Note

1. At a Glance

• Core issue: Frequent interruptions and disruptions in Parliament and State Assemblies undermine the deliberative function of democratic institutions — raised by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla as a "serious challenge." [S1]
• Why it matters for UPSC: Directly maps to GS-II (Parliament & State Legislatures, Functioning of Democracy) and recurring Mains questions on parliamentary productivity, presiding officers' powers, and institutional reforms.
• Disruptions deprive citizens of meaningful debate, block Question Hour utility, and prevent scrutiny of legislation — all central to legislative accountability. [S4]
• The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) provides the institutional forum through which Indian presiding officers coordinate on best practices across legislatures. [S1][S2]

2. Why in the News

• June 10, 2026: Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, addressing the Second Conference of CPA India Region Zone-II (North Zone) at Chandigarh, stated that disruptions in Parliament and State Assemblies pose a serious challenge to democratic institutions. [S1 — article]
• He announced the conference concluded with four resolutions aimed at making legislative institutions more effective, accountable, and people-centric. [S1 — article]
• November 2025: Speaker Birla had earlier, at the 22nd Annual Conference of CPA India Region Zone-III in Kohima, warned that planned disruptions not only undermine democratic processes but also deprive citizens of meaningful deliberations. [S2]
• He referenced the Winter Session (commencing December 1, 2025), urging all political parties to ensure smooth House proceedings. [S2]

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

Constitutional & Procedural Framework

• Article 93: Election of Speaker and Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha
• Article 178: Speaker of State Legislative Assembly
• Article 105 & 194: Parliamentary privileges — members cannot be sued for speech/vote in House
• Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha: Governs adjournment motions, calling attention motions, zero hour, etc.
• Article 122 / Article 212: Courts cannot inquire into proceedings of Parliament / State Legislature
• Tenth Schedule (1985): Anti-defection law — Speaker is adjudicator; amended in 2003 (91st Amendment) to remove merger provision partially [S5]

Key Bodies

Instruments Used to Disrupt / Respond to Disruption

• Adjournment Motion (Rule 56, Lok Sabha): Raises definite matter of urgent public importance — requires Speaker's consent
• Calling Attention Motion (Rule 197): Draws minister's attention to urgent matter
• Zero Hour: Informal; not in Rules of Procedure — used for impromptu issues
• Suspension under Rule 374/374A: Speaker can suspend disruptive members for remainder of session

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Legal / Constitutional

• Speaker's power to expunge unparliamentary remarks (Rule 380, Lok Sabha) and suspend members (Rule 374A — introduced 2001 — allows automatic suspension for five consecutive sitting days). [S3]
• Anti-Defection Law (Tenth Schedule) paradoxically contributes to disruptions: parties issue whips to disrupt en masse, as members who defy face disqualification. [S5]
• Article 122 bars judicial review of parliamentary proceedings — meaning no court can remedy a disrupted session; reform must be internal.

Governance / Institutional

• PRS India data: disruptions in winter sessions have led to sessions working at <20% of scheduled time; bills passed in < 5 minutes without debate. [S4]
• Question Hour — the primary accountability mechanism — is often first casualty of disruptions; ministers escape scrutiny.
• Speaker Birla's framing: solution lies "within legislative institutions themselves" — pointing to self-regulation over statutory intervention. [S1 — article]

Administrative

• Capacity of legislators: Speaker emphasised capacity enhancement as key — BPST and CPA programmes target this. [S1 — article]
• Technology use: Speaker called for maximising technology in legislative processes — echoes e-Vidhan (digital legislature project) rollout across State Assemblies.
• Citizen participation: Resolutions at CPA Zone-II conference included involving citizens in policy/law framing — linked to pre-legislative consultation norm.

Ethical / Accountability

• "Society is shaped by the conduct and behaviour of its leadership" — Speaker Birla, June 2026. [S1 — article]
• Exemplary conduct of public representatives is a constitutional expectation; disruptions signal breakdown of political ethics.
• Disruption as a strategic tool by opposition raises a normative tension: disruption can be a form of protest where other channels are blocked, but it sacrifices legislative output.

Historical / Comparative

• UK Parliament: Speaker has power to name a member and have them removed by motion — stronger enforcement than India.
• Pre-1989 India: Disruptions were exceptions; post-coalition era normalised them as opposition tactics.
• 72nd Conference of Presiding Officers (2023): Collectively resolved to improve productivity — continuity with Birla's 2026 statement.

6. Recent Developments (Last 12–18 Months)

• October 2025: Speaker Om Birla led Indian Parliamentary Delegation to 68th Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference, Bridgetown, Barbados (October 5–12, 2025). [S3]
• November 2025: Addressed 22nd Annual CPA India Region Zone-III conference, Kohima — warned against planned disruptions ahead of Winter Session (December 1, 2025). [S2]
• September 2025: Inaugurated 11th CPA India Region Conference, Bengaluru. [S3]
• June 10, 2026: Addressed Second CPA India Region Zone-II (North Zone) Conference, Chandigarh — announced four resolutions; linked legislative functioning to Viksit Bharat vision. [S1 — article]
• Ongoing rollout of e-Vidhan (digital legislature) under Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs — aimed at improving legislative efficiency.

7. Prelims Hooks

1. Tenth Schedule of the Constitution — inserted by 52nd Constitutional Amendment, 1985 — governs anti-defection; Speaker is the adjudicator. [S5]
2. Rule 374A of Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure — provides for automatic suspension of a member for the remainder of the session for grave disorder (introduced 2001).
3. The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) India Region is divided into 9 Zones.
4. CPA India Region Zone-II (North Zone) conference (June 2026) was held at Chandigarh; presided over by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla. [S1 — article]
5. Article 122 bars courts from inquiring into proceedings of Parliament; equivalent for State Legislatures is Article 212.
6. Zero Hour in Parliament is not mentioned in the Rules of Procedure — it is a convention that begins at noon.
7. Speaker's power to expunge unparliamentary remarks — governed by Rule 380 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure.
8. 91st Constitutional Amendment (2003) amended the Tenth Schedule — capped Council of Ministers at 15% of Lok Sabha strength and eliminated the merger exception partially.
9. Bureau of Parliamentary Studies and Training (BPST) functions under the Lok Sabha Secretariat (not the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs).
10. Adjournment Motion (Rule 56) requires the Speaker's consent and relates to definite matters of urgent public importance; it is a censure motion on the government.
11. PRS India documented Lok Sabha working at 14% of scheduled time and Rajya Sabha at 5% during one of the least productive sessions of the 16th Lok Sabha. [S4]
12. The Presiding Officers' Conference is an annual conclave of Speakers and Chairpersons of all Union and State legislatures — chaired by the Lok Sabha Speaker.
13. Speaker Birla linked strong legislative institutions to the Viksit Bharat vision at the June 2026 CPA conference. [S1 — article]

8. Mains Relevance

Plausible Mains Question Stems:

1. "Disruptions in legislatures are not merely procedural inconveniences but represent a structural crisis in Indian democracy." Critically examine the causes, consequences, and possible reforms. (GS-II, 15 marks)
2. "The Anti-Defection Law, intended to ensure stability, paradoxically incentivises collective disruption. Discuss with reference to parliamentary productivity data." (GS-II, 10 marks)
3. "The Speaker of Lok Sabha occupies a constitutional office that must balance partisan origins with institutional neutrality. How can this tension be resolved to address legislative disruptions?" (GS-II, 15 marks)

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

1. Speaker vs. Chairman: The Lok Sabha has a Speaker; the Rajya Sabha has a Chairman (the Vice-President ex-officio). Disruption management tools differ — Rajya Sabha has no equivalent of Rule 374A.
2. Anti-Defection adjudicator: The Speaker decides disqualification petitions under the Tenth Schedule — not the Election Commission. EC handles party recognition, not individual disqualification.
3. Zero Hour is NOT in the Rules: Aspirants often treat Zero Hour as a formal procedural instrument — it has no mention in Rules of Procedure; it is purely conventional (≈ 12 noon).
4. CPA India Region Zones ≠ CPA Regions globally: India forms one region in the global CPA but is subdivided into 9 zones internally — do not confuse with international CPA regional structure.
5. Article 122/212 scope: These bar inquiry into proceedings — they do not grant absolute immunity to members for acts outside the House (e.g., bribery to vote — settled in P.V. Narasimha Rao case, 1998; being revisited after Sita Soren judgment, 2024).

11. Sources

• [S1] "Disruptions in legislatures pose a serious challenge: LS Speaker" — The Hindu, June 10, 2026 — Article content provided in prompt — (Tier 4)
• [S2] "Lok Sabha Speaker urges all political parties to uphold dignity of legislative institutions; says planned disruptions weaken democracy" — PIB Press Release — https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2188381 — (Tier 1)
• [S3] "Lok Sabha Speaker to Inaugurate First Conference of Zone VII of CPA India Region in Goa" / "CPA conference a significant milestone" — PIB — https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseDetail.aspx?PRID=2250904 — (Tier 1)
• [S4] "The Cost of Parliamentary Disruption" — PRS India — https://prsindia.org/articles-by-prs-team/the-cost-of-parliamentary-disruption — (Tier 1)
• [S5] "Anti-Defection Law — Intent and Impact" — PRS India — https://prsindia.org/files/parliament/discussion_papers/Anti-Defection%20Law%20Intent%20and%20Impact_0.pdf — (Tier 1)