‘Nuclear plants require lifetime commitment’

Good, sufficient facts gathered. Writing the note now.

'Nuclear Plants Require Lifetime Commitment' — SHANTI Act, 2025

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

Feature Detail
Full name Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Act, 2025 [Article][S1]
Introduced Lok Sabha, 15 December 2025 [S1]
Assent President, 20 December 2025 [S1]
Laws repealed Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010 [S1][S3]
Regulator Statutory recognition to Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) [S1]
Liability structure Graded, Second Schedule: ₹100 crore to ₹3,000 crore, scaled by thermal capacity (largest slab: reactors >3,600 MW) [S2]
Old liability cap (CLNDA 2010) Flat ₹1,500 crore
Supplier liability Contractual right only (no automatic statutory right of recourse), unless intent to cause damage proven [S2]
Residual liability Union Government bears liability beyond Second Schedule caps — Section 14 [S2]
Licensee duties Section 10 — prescribes safety, security, safeguards duties on licensee (public or private) [Article]
Capacity target 100 GW nuclear power by 2047 (from 8.7 GW) [Article][S2]
Climate linkage Supports India's Net Zero by 2070 commitment [S2]
Private entry Private Indian firms, joint ventures, foreign entities allowed to build/own/operate/decommission plants under Central Government license + AERB safety authorisation [S1][S3]

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Economic - Opens a capital-intensive sector to private and foreign investment, easing fiscal burden on the Union for nuclear expansion [S2][S3]. - Graded liability caps reduce entry barriers for smaller private players (fuel cycle facilities, smaller reactors) [S2].

Legal/Constitutional - Single consolidated Act replacing two separate 1962/2010 statutes — a rare instance of comprehensive nuclear law codification [S1][S3]. - Shifts supplier liability from statutory right of recourse (CLNDA 2010, the provision that deterred US suppliers like GE, Westinghouse) to a contractual regime [S2].

Scientific/Technological - AERB given statutory status (previously an executive body under DAE notification), strengthening independence of safety regulation [S1]. - Enables private R&D and diverse reactor designs given differentiated capacity slabs.

Ethical/Governance - Concerns flagged over "regulatory tricks" and fudging — veterans stress Section 10 duties are non-negotiable, radioisotope half-lives are physical constants, cannot be manipulated [Article]. - Transparency debate: adequacy of ₹100–3,000 crore caps vs actual Fukushima/Chernobyl-scale liabilities.

Administrative - Long gestation and decommissioning periods ("lifetime commitment") require continuous financial security mechanisms — a key implementation challenge for new private entrants unfamiliar with multi-decade regulatory compliance [Article]. - Union Government retains role as liability-backstop, meaning administrative/fiscal exposure persists despite privatisation [S2].

Strategic/Geopolitical - Diluting the strict supplier liability regime is aimed at attracting foreign nuclear technology suppliers, previously deterred by CLNDA 2010's recourse clause.

6. Recent Developments (last 12–18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources