T.Nadu raffle to be revived

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

Item Detail
Scheme name Tamil Nadu State Raffle
First introduced August 1968 [S1]
First discontinued September 1975 [S1]
Revival announced 30 July 1976 [S1]
Ticket price (1976 revival) ₹1 per ticket [S1]
Draw frequency Monthly [S1]
Employment generated ~2,500 agents [S1]
Revenue use (first ₹1 crore) Drinking water supply, drought-hit areas [S1]
Revenue use (balance) House-sites for Harijans (SCs) [S1]
Official quoted S. Guhan, Finance Secretary, Tamil Nadu [S1]
Governing statute (post-1979) Tamil Nadu Prize Schemes (Prohibition) Act, 1979 [S2]
Central enabling law Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 [S4]
Constitutional entries List I Entry 40 (Union — lotteries organised by GoI/State); List II Entry 34 (State — betting & gambling)
TN lottery ban year 2003 [S3]

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Economic - Lotteries historically functioned as a non-tax revenue instrument for states, earmarked for specific welfare capex (drinking water, housing) rather than general budget [S1]. - Generated direct employment (agent networks) — an early instance of state-created gig/commission-based livelihoods [S1].

Social - Targeted welfare beneficiaries: drought-affected populations (drinking water) and Harijans/Scheduled Castes (house-sites), showing lotteries used as a redistributive/welfare-financing tool [S1]. - Later banned partly on grounds that lotteries exploit low-income groups and encourage gambling addiction [S3].

Legal / Constitutional - "Betting and gambling" is a State List subject (Entry 34, List II); "lotteries organised by the Government of India or a State" fall under Union List Entry 40, creating a dual-track regulatory space [S4]. - The Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 is the central framework Act; states retain discretion under Section 5 to permit or prohibit lotteries within their territory [S4][S3]. - TN's 1979 Prize Schemes (Prohibition) Act predates the 1998 central Act and targeted private prize schemes/draws [S2].

Administrative / Governance - Revival required re-registration priority for pre-existing (Sept 1975) authorised agents before fresh appointments — an early example of stakeholder-transition policy in state schemes [S1]. - Logistics (printing tickets, organising sale machinery) caused a ~2-month lag between announcement and first draw — illustrates implementation lead-time in state-run schemes [S1].

Historical - TN's lottery policy shows a cyclical pattern: introduced (1968) → discontinued (1975) → revived (1976) → statutorily curtailed (1979) → fully banned (2003), useful as a case study of policy reversal driven by changing political/moral positions [S1][S2][S3].

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks (high-density factual bullets)

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources