The problem with India’s free trade agreement strategy

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

Item Detail
Nodal ministry Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce [S2]
Monitoring mechanism Every FTA has a Joint Review Mechanism to track implementation [S2]
Total India RTAs/FTAs in force 13 [S2]
India-EFTA TEPA Signed 10 March 2024; in force 1 October 2025; EFTA commitment: USD 100 billion FDI increase over 15 years, target 1 million direct jobs [S5]
India-UK CETA Signed July 2025 [S4]
India-UAE CEPA Effective May 2022; 2nd Joint Committee meeting held 10 Oct 2024, Dubai [S3]
India-Australia ECTA Implemented December 2022; CECA negotiations ongoing [S3]
India-ASEAN goods pact under review AITIGA (Trade in Goods Agreement) [S2]
Ongoing FTA negotiations United States, Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, Canada [S6]
Core critique India's trade with ASEAN, South Korea, Japan, Singapore has become increasingly import-driven, widening bilateral trade deficits [S6]

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Economic - FTAs with Asian partners (ASEAN, Korea, Japan, Singapore) have coincided with widening trade deficits rather than the promised export/GVC gains. [S6] - Tariff concessions under FTAs can trigger import surges in sectors where domestic industry lacks competitiveness (steel, chemicals, electronics components). - Raises the "elephant in the room" issue: FTA utilization rates by Indian exporters remain low due to rules-of-origin compliance costs — a recurring commerce ministry concern.

Geopolitical/Strategic - Post-2022 FTA wave (UAE, Australia, EFTA, UK, EU) reflects a bilateralism-first strategy, diversifying away from stalled multilateral WTO processes and hedging against China-centric RCEP (which India opted out of in 2019). [S1][S6] - Ongoing US, Gulf, Canada talks show FTAs doubling as instruments of strategic alignment, not just trade — echoing Indo-Pacific supply-chain diversification goals.

Administrative/Governance - Joint Review Mechanisms exist for each FTA but the Hindu BusinessLine critique implies they haven't corrected structural deficit trends with Asian partners. [S2][S6] - India has proactively invoked FTA review clauses (e.g., seeking Japan CEPA review) — signals institutional recognition of the deficit problem, but implementation lag persists. [S2]

Historical - India's abstention from RCEP (2019) — partly over ASEAN-China trade deficit fears — sits in tension with continuing under RCEP-adjacent bilateral ASEAN commitments now blamed for similar deficit dynamics. [S6]

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources