UPSC Prelims Practice Questions — A new political balance in Washington
Q1. With reference to midterm elections in the United States, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- They are held halfway through the President's four-year term and do not decide who holds the presidency.
- Their results can change the party balance in both houses of Congress at the same election.
- Because senators are elected on a staggered basis, the composition of the Senate is not affected by midterm elections.
- A. 1 and 2 only
- B. 1, 2 and 3
- C. 2 and 3 only
- D. 1 only
Q2. Consider the following facts about the US federal system. Members of the House of Representatives serve two-year terms, and every seat is contested in each even-numbered year. Senators serve six-year terms, staggered so that about one-third of the seats are contested every two years. The President is elected for a four-year term. Consider the following inferences: Which of the inferences given above can validly be drawn from these facts?
- In each presidential term, the entire House faces the electorate at least once in an election where the presidency is not on the ballot.
- A senator elected in the same year as a President can remain in office after that President's term ends without having faced re-election.
- The House is more directly exposed than the Senate to a short-term swing in voter mood.
- A. 1 and 3 only
- B. 1 and 2 only
- C. 1, 2 and 3
- D. 2 and 3 only
Q3. With reference to the terms 'lame duck' and 'divided government' as used in US politics, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A President serving a final term that cannot be renewed can be called a lame duck even while the President's own party controls both houses of Congress.
- The two terms describe the same situation, because each arises only when the President's party loses control of Congress.
- Divided government can exist from the very start of a presidential term if voters elect a President of one party and a House majority of another.
- A. 1, 2 and 3
- B. 2 and 3 only
- C. 1 only
- D. 1 and 3 only
Q4. Consider the following statements in the context of the India–US framework for an interim trade agreement: Which of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- Under an interim trade agreement leading to a free-trade area, two WTO members may give each other tariff concessions that they do not extend to other WTO members.
- The WTO's Most-Favoured-Nation principle applies only to multilateral agreements and does not bind members in their bilateral trade arrangements.
- A. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- B. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- C. Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- D. Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Q5. Consider the following statements: Which of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- Unlike a US President, an Indian Prime Minister cannot remain in office for the rest of the Lok Sabha's term after the Lok Sabha has expressed a lack of confidence in the Council of Ministers.
- The Council of Ministers in India is collectively responsible to the House of the People.
- A. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- B. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- C. Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- D. Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Q6. Consider the following assertion: 'A House of Representatives controlled by the opposition can constrain a President's unilateral policies even though it cannot remove the President from office on its own.' Consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above support the assertion?
- The President holds office only as long as the President retains the confidence of a majority in the House.
- Every federal law, including those funding executive programmes, needs the approval of the House.
- The House can dissolve itself and seek a fresh mandate to strengthen its hand against the President.
- House committees can scrutinise executive actions through oversight hearings.
- A. 1, 3 and 4 only
- B. 2 and 4 only
- C. 1 and 2 only
- D. 2, 3 and 4 only
Q7. Suppose a party holds a simple majority in the US House of Representatives but well under two-thirds of the seats in either house, while the President belongs to a rival party. Consider the following inferences about what this party can do: Which of the inferences given above can validly be drawn?
- It can initiate impeachment proceedings against the President.
- It can enact its own legislative agenda even over the President's veto.
- It cannot, by itself, secure the President's removal from office.
- It can ensure that no new revenue-raising law is enacted without the consent of the chamber it controls.
- A. 1 and 3 only
- B. 1, 2, 3 and 4
- C. 1, 3 and 4 only
- D. 2 and 4 only
Q8. With reference to an 'interim agreement' leading to a free-trade area under Article XXIV of GATT, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Once notified to the WTO, such an agreement may be kept in force indefinitely even if the parties never complete the free-trade area.
- It is expected to include a plan and schedule for completing the free-trade area within a reasonable length of time.
- On its institution, the duties applied by the parties to trade with non-members should not, on the whole, be higher or more restrictive than before.
- A. 2 and 3 only
- B. 1 only
- C. 1, 2 and 3
- D. 1 and 2 only