UPSC Prelims Practice Questions — Red tape leaves UGC scheme for the study of social inclusion in limbo, leads to salary crisis
Q1. With reference to the University Grants Commission (UGC), consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Because the UGC was created by an Act of Parliament, it can be replaced through ordinary legislation without any constitutional amendment.
- Under the UGC Act framework, the UGC both determines and maintains standards in universities and disburses grants to them.
- The UGC's standard-setting role is confined to central universities, since universities created by State legislatures lie outside its purview.
- A. 2 and 3 only
- B. 1 and 2 only
- C. 1 only
- D. 1, 2 and 3
Q2. Consider the following statements: Which of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- Central schemes that originated during the Five-Year Plan era now need fresh appraisal and approval to continue beyond the end of a Finance Commission cycle.
- NITI Aayog, which replaced the Planning Commission, is a constitutional body under Article 280 that recommends how resources are divided between the Union and the States.
- A. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- B. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- C. Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- D. Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Q3. With reference to the present system of approving the continuation of Central Sector and Centrally Sponsored Schemes, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Once a scheme is approved for a full Finance Commission cycle, its funds can be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund of India in later years of that cycle without a fresh annual appropriation by Parliament.
- Each such scheme now carries a sunset date co-terminus with the Finance Commission cycle.
- Continuation of a scheme into a new cycle is based on a third-party evaluation of that scheme.
- A. 3 only
- B. 1 and 2 only
- C. 1, 2 and 3
- D. 2 and 3 only
Q4. After the Lok Sabha has voted the demands for grants, a member wishes to move an amendment to the Appropriation Bill to shift part of the sum voted under one grant towards university-based social inclusion centres. Which one of the following correctly describes the position?
- A. Not permissible, as grants for education are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India
- B. Permissible only if moved in the Lok Sabha, as money matters lie with that House
- C. Not permissible, as no amendment to such a Bill may alter the destination of a grant
- D. Permissible only if the Speaker certifies the amendment as a Money Bill provision
Q5. With reference to the financial procedure of the Union, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A vote on account is a grant for an exceptional purpose that forms no part of the current service of any financial year.
- Salaries of teaching staff of central universities are expenditure charged on the Consolidated Fund of India and are therefore not voted upon by the Lok Sabha.
- Expenditure charged on the Consolidated Fund of India may be discussed in Parliament even though it is not submitted to the vote.
- A. 3 only
- B. 1 only
- C. 1 and 3 only
- D. 2 and 3 only
Q6. With reference to clauses (4) and (5) of Article 15 of the Constitution of India, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Article 15(4) enables special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes generally, and is not confined to admission in educational institutions.
- Article 15(5) extends to minority educational institutions that receive aid from the State, though not to unaided minority institutions.
- Special provisions under Article 15(5) must be made by law, whereas Article 15(4) contains no such express requirement.
- A. 2 and 3 only
- B. 1, 2 and 3
- C. 1 and 3 only
- D. 1 only
Q7. Consider the following assertion: A State law may require a private, unaided, non-minority engineering college to reserve seats in admission for Scheduled Caste students. Which of the following statements support/supports the above assertion?
- Article 30(1) protects every private educational institution's right to administer itself free of State-mandated admissions.
- Article 15(5) covers private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the State.
- Article 46, being a Directive Principle, makes such reservations enforceable as a right in a court of law.
- Article 15(5) provides that the right under Article 19(1)(g) shall not prevent such special provisions.
- A. 2, 3 and 4 only
- B. 2 and 4 only
- C. 1 and 2 only
- D. 1, 3 and 4 only
Q8. Consider the following facts about three institutions: X was declared a deemed-to-be university by the Central Government under Section 3 of the UGC Act, 1956. Y was incorporated by an Act of Parliament in 1915. Z was incorporated by an Act of a State legislature. Which of the following inferences can be drawn from the above?
- Y must receive its entire funding as grants from the UGC.
- Z can award valid degrees only after it is recognised by an Act of Parliament.
- Both Y and Z can award degrees under the laws that created them.
- X may frame its own syllabus and admission criteria as a degree-awarding institution.
- A. 2 and 3 only
- B. 1, 3 and 4 only
- C. 1 and 2 only
- D. 3 and 4 only