UPSC Prelims Practice Questions — Centre to set up panel to review UGC equity norms
Q1. Consider the following assertion: A regulation framed by the University Grants Commission on campus discrimination cannot validly confer on the Commission a power that the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 does not give it. Which of the statements given above support/supports the assertion?
- The UGC Act, 1956 empowers the Commission to make regulations that are consistent with the Act and the rules made under it.
- The University Grants Commission is a body created by an Act of Parliament and not by the Constitution.
- The 2026 equity Regulations of the Commission were opposed by groups of students who called them one-sided.
- A. 1, 2 and 3
- B. 1 and 2 only
- C. 1 only
- D. 2 and 3 only
Q2. With reference to the constitutional provisions against caste discrimination, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above are correct?
- Article 15(2) bars caste-based restrictions on access to shops, public restaurants and hotels even when these are privately owned.
- Article 29(2) bars denial of admission on grounds only of caste to educational institutions maintained by the State or receiving aid out of State funds.
- Article 29(2) can be invoked only by citizens belonging to religious or linguistic minorities.
- Article 15(5) enables special provisions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in admission to private unaided institutions too, except minority educational institutions.
- A. 1, 3 and 4 only
- B. 2, 3 and 4 only
- C. 1, 2 and 4 only
- D. 1 and 2 only
Q3. Consider the following statements regarding the equality provisions that are relevant to campus anti-discrimination rules: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Article 14 can be invoked by any person, including a foreign national studying in India, whereas Article 15(1) can be invoked only by citizens.
- Article 15(1) lists language among the grounds on which the State shall not discriminate, as Article 29(2) does for admission to State-aided institutions.
- A. 1 only
- B. 2 only
- C. Both 1 and 2
- D. Neither 1 nor 2
Q4. Suppose a UGC regulation creates a dedicated grievance mechanism for complaints of caste discrimination raised by students from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, and a student from another group challenges it under Article 14. Consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- The mere fact that the mechanism is designed for a defined group of students does not by itself violate Article 14.
- The classification will be valid under Article 14 so long as the body framing the regulation is competent to frame it, irrespective of the classification's connection with the regulation's object.
- If the classification bears no rational relation to the regulation's object, it can be struck down even though the group it favours is a disadvantaged one.
- A. 1 only
- B. 2 and 3 only
- C. 1, 2 and 3
- D. 1 and 3 only
Q5. Consider the following statements: Which of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- The Constitution permits the State to make special provisions for the advancement of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, including in admission to educational institutions, notwithstanding the general bar on caste-based discrimination.
- Article 15(1) prohibits the State from discriminating against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.
- A. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- B. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- C. Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- D. Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Q6. Which of the following pairs of bodies can be abolished only through an amendment of the Constitution, and not by an ordinary Act of Parliament?
- A. NCSC and NCST
- B. NCSC and NHRC
- C. NCST and UGC
- D. UGC and NHRC