UPSC Prelims Practice Questions — Tough stance on Kishau dam project led to victory in BBMB dues case: Sukhu
Q1. Consider the following statements: Which of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- Himachal Pradesh's claim to arrears of its power share from BBMB projects has been adjudicated by the Supreme Court rather than by a tribunal set up under the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956.
- Under Article 262, the bar on the jurisdiction of courts over inter-State river water disputes operates by force of the Constitution itself, without any law made by Parliament.
- A. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- B. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- C. Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- D. Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Q2. With reference to the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 131 of the Constitution of India, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- In a dispute between two States, the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction under this Article excludes the jurisdiction of every other court.
- The Article is attracted only where the dispute involves a question of law or fact on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends.
- The Article does not extend to a dispute arising out of a pre-Constitution agreement that continues in operation after the commencement of the Constitution.
- A. 1, 2 and 3
- B. 1 and 2 only
- C. 2 and 3 only
- D. 1 and 3 only
Q3. Consider the following statements: Which of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- In the Kishau multipurpose project, the cost of the power component is to be shared by Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand instead of being borne largely by the Centre.
- Central grant under the National Projects scheme is extended only to the irrigation and drinking water components of a project.
- A. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- B. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- C. Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- D. Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Q4. Consider the following facts about the Kishau multipurpose project: it lies on the Tons in the hill States of Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh; its stored water is to benefit downstream basin States including Delhi; its execution required an agreement among six basin States; and the Centre funds about 90% of its water component. Which of the following inferences can validly be drawn from the above?
- The consent of each upstream State is a source of leverage that it can use in negotiations with the downstream beneficiary States.
- The downstream beneficiary States will bear most of the project's displacement and rehabilitation burden.
- The participating States will carry no part of the project's cost.
- A. 2 and 3 only
- B. 1 only
- C. 1, 2 and 3
- D. 1 and 3 only
Q5. With reference to the institutional mechanisms for inter-State coordination in India, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Zonal Councils are statutory bodies set up under a law of Parliament rather than under a specific Article of the Constitution.
- The Constitution itself establishes a permanent Inter-State Council, and Article 263 merely prescribes its composition.
- Matters arising out of the reorganisation of States are among those on which Zonal Councils may discuss and make recommendations.
- A. 1 only
- B. 1 and 2 only
- C. 1 and 3 only
- D. 2 and 3 only