UPSC Prelims Practice Questions — The challenge to not breach the limit
Q1. The constitutional ceiling of 50% on total reservations, whose breach forced Karnataka to revise its quota matrix before the 2026 recruitment of 56,432 posts, was formally laid down by the Supreme Court in which one of the following cases?
- A. M.R. Balaji v. State of Mysore (1962)
- B. Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)
- C. E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004)
- D. State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh (2024)
Q2. Which one of the following was the earliest Supreme Court ruling that first indicated that reservations should ordinarily not exceed 50% — the principle later crystallised as a binding cap?
- A. State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (1951)
- B. M.R. Balaji v. State of Mysore (1962)
- C. Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)
- D. M. Nagaraj v. Union of India (2006)
Q3. In State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh (2024) — the ruling that enabled Karnataka to design internal sub-classification within its 15% SC quota — what was the strength of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court that delivered the judgment?
- A. Five judges
- B. Seven judges
- C. Nine judges
- D. Eleven judges