UPSC Prelims Practice Questions — Commercial farming in forest land is not protected by FRA: SC
Q1. Consider the following situations under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006: Which of the situations given above is/are consistent with the Act?
- A forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribe family seeks recognition of its right over a plot it has cultivated for subsistence since well before December 2005.
- A forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribe family seeks recognition of its right over a plot it first brought under cultivation for subsistence in 2012.
- A family holding a recognised title for self-cultivation sells that title to a neighbouring farmer who needs more land.
- A. 2 and 3 only
- B. 1 and 2 only
- C. 1 only
- D. 1, 2 and 3
Q2. Consider the following statements: Which of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- The Supreme Court has said that the cultivation of commercial crops in reserve forest areas is not protected by the Forest Rights Act, 2006.
- The right to hold and live in forest land under the Forest Rights Act, 2006 is framed around habitation or self-cultivation for livelihood.
- A. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- B. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- C. Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- D. Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Q3. Consider the following statements: Which of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- A State Government's decision alone is not sufficient to put forest land under horticultural crops.
- The Indian Forest Act, 1927 vests the decision on diverting forest land for non-forest purposes in the Central Government.
- A. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- B. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- C. Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- D. Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Q4. With reference to eligibility under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- The requirement of showing three generations of residence applies to Other Traditional Forest Dwellers and not to forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes.
- An Other Traditional Forest Dweller must prove possession of the specific plot claimed throughout the three-generation period.
- Occupation of the land claimed before the December 2005 cut-off is required of claimants from both groups.
- A. 1 only
- B. 1 and 3 only
- C. 1, 2 and 3
- D. 2 and 3 only
Q5. With reference to the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam, 1980, as amended in 2023, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Establishing fire lines and fencing in a forest counts as a non-forest purpose requiring prior central approval.
- Assigning forest land by lease to a government-owned entity also requires prior central approval.
- Land recorded as forest in a government record may be covered by the Act even if it was not notified under the Indian Forest Act, 1927.
- A. 2 and 3 only
- B. 1, 2 and 3
- C. 1 and 2 only
- D. 3 only
Q6. With reference to forest and conservation designations, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Designation of an area as a biosphere reserve requires that human settlements be excluded from all of its zones.
- A reserved forest comes into being through a notification issued by the Central Government under the Indian Forest Act, 1927.
- A. 1 only
- B. 2 only
- C. Both 1 and 2
- D. Neither 1 nor 2