UPSC Prelims Practice Questions — India’s Chemicals and Petrochemicals Sector: A Foundation for Industrial Growth
Q1. With reference to Quality Control Orders (QCOs) in India, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A BIS standard does not by itself oblige a manufacturer to carry the Standard Mark; the obligation arises when the Central Government notifies a QCO for that product.
- Because a QCO binds imported and domestically made goods alike, it can restrict substandard imports without any change in customs duty.
- Under the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, India may apply a QCO to an imported chemical while exempting the like domestic chemical, if the aim is consumer safety.
- A. 2 and 3 only
- B. 1, 2 and 3
- C. 1 and 3 only
- D. 1 and 2 only
Q2. Consider the following statements: Which of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- A Quality Control Order on a chemical can be challenged at the WTO as an unnecessary obstacle to trade even if it applies equally to domestic and imported products.
- The WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade requires technical regulations to be no more trade-restrictive than necessary to fulfil a legitimate objective.
- A. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- B. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- C. Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- D. Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Q3. Under the BHAVYA Rasayan scheme, each chemical park must have a large contiguous, encumbrance-free land parcel. What is this condition chiefly meant to make possible?
- A. Let the Centre acquire the land directly and lease it out to private developers
- B. Ensure that each park sits inside the boundary of an already notified PCPIR
- C. Lay shared pipelines, effluent networks and utilities without piecemeal land disputes
- D. Qualify the park for exemption from environmental clearance as an industrial estate
Q4. Consider the following assertion: Locating small chemical units in parks that provide common effluent and waste-handling facilities can improve their environmental compliance. Which of the following statements support/supports the above assertion?
- Many small units cannot individually afford a dedicated effluent treatment plant but can share the fixed cost of a common one.
- A common facility gives the regulator a single treatment and discharge point to monitor in place of many scattered outfalls.
- Solvent recovery units allow spent solvents to be reclaimed, reducing the quantity of hazardous waste that must be disposed of.
- A. 1 and 3 only
- B. 1, 2 and 3
- C. 1 and 2 only
- D. 2 and 3 only
Q5. With reference to emergency planning for Major Accident Hazard (MAH) installations in India, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above are correct?
- The on-site emergency plan is prepared by the occupier of the installation, while the off-site emergency plan is the responsibility of the district administration.
- The off-site emergency plan is confined to hazards within the factory premises and excludes the transport of hazardous chemicals by road or pipeline.
- The Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness and Response) Rules, 1996 replaced the Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989, which therefore no longer govern off-site planning.
- A district-level crisis group reviews the on-site emergency plans prepared by the occupiers of MAH installations.
- A. 1 and 4 only
- B. 1, 2 and 4 only
- C. 1, 3 and 4 only
- D. 2 and 3 only
Q6. Consider the following statements: Which of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- India's chemical-accident framework sets up crisis groups at the central, State, district and local levels instead of leaving emergency response to the occupier of the factory alone.
- The Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness and Response) Rules, 1996 were notified under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
- A. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- B. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- C. Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- D. Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Q7. With reference to the challenge-route design of the BHAVYA Rasayan scheme for chemical parks, consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- The parks are to be developed by the Union Government, with States limited to suggesting suitable sites.
- Central assistance is not divided among all States by a fixed formula; it goes only to proposals selected through competition.
- A State may propose a brownfield site, such as an existing industrial area, as well as a greenfield site.
- A. 2 and 3 only
- B. 1, 2 and 3
- C. 2 only
- D. 1 and 3 only
Q8. Consider the following facts about a Centre–State scheme: The Centre will support three chemical parks, to be developed by State Governments chosen through a challenge route. The total outlay is ₹3,030 crore. Of this, ₹3,000 crore is for common infrastructure and utilities inside the parks and ₹30 crore is for administrative expenditure. For each park the Centre gives a grant of up to ₹1,000 crore, subject to a minimum contribution of ₹500 crore by the State Government. Which of the following inferences can be drawn from the above?
- Not every State that wants to host a chemical park can obtain central assistance under the scheme.
- The Centre's grant will meet at least two-thirds of the infrastructure cost of every park that is selected.
- Nearly the entire outlay is meant for physical infrastructure inside the parks rather than for running the scheme.
- The infrastructure outlay is just enough for each of the three parks to receive the maximum permissible central grant.
- A. 1, 2, 3 and 4
- B. 2 and 4 only
- C. 1, 3 and 4 only
- D. 1 and 3 only