Death penalty

Polity & Governance glossary

Also called: Capital punishment · Topic: Fundamental Rights and Constitutional Remedies · NCERT: Beyond NCERT

Meaning

The death penalty (capital punishment) is the State killing a person as punishment for a very serious crime, after a court has convicted them and ordered it. In India it is allowed, because Article 21 lets the State take a life "according to procedure established by law". But since Bachan Singh (1980), courts may give it only in the "rarest of rare" cases. It matters because it is the one punishment that cannot be undone. That makes it a lasting debate about the right to life, fair trial and human rights.

Explanation

How it fits with the right to life

  • Article 21: "No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law."
  • The words "deprived of his life" show the Constitution does not ban the death penalty.

  • It only requires that life be taken through a valid legal procedure.

  • Procedure established by law (taken from Japan): life may be taken only through a procedure set out in a valid law.

  • A.K. Gopalan (1950) treated any law passed by the legislature as enough.
  • Maneka Gandhi (1978) held that the procedure must be "right, just and fair". Articles 14, 19 and 21 must be read together (the golden triangle).
  • So a death sentence must come from a fair law, used fairly. A law simply being on the books is not enough.

The "rarest of rare" doctrine

  • Bachan Singh (1980): the death penalty is constitutional. But it may be given only in the "rarest of rare" cases, where life imprisonment is clearly not enough.
  • What this means:
  • Life imprisonment is the normal rule. Death is the exception.
  • The judge must look at the crime and also the criminal before choosing death.
  • The death penalty survives, but inside a narrow gate.

Safeguards around a death sentence

  • Article 20(1), against ex post facto law (a law that punishes past acts): no one can get a heavier penalty than the law allowed when the act was done. So a death sentence cannot be added to a crime after it was committed.
  • Article 20(3): an accused cannot be forced to give evidence against themselves. Forced narco-analysis is not allowed (Selvi, 2010).
  • Article 22(1)-(2): an arrested person must be told why they are arrested and may consult a lawyer. They must be brought before a magistrate within 24 hours.
  • Right to speedy trial (Hussainara Khatoon, 1979): this is part of Article 21. Long delays break it.
  • Emergency cannot remove these rights:
  • Under Article 359, the President can never suspend the right to go to court for Articles 20 and 21 (44th Amendment, 1978).

  • So, unlike in ADM Jabalpur (1976), the protection of life stays even in an emergency.

  • Mercy powers (constitutional text):

  • The President (Article 72) can pardon, commute (change to a lighter sentence), remit or suspend any death sentence.
  • The Governor (Article 161) can suspend, remit or commute a death sentence. Only the President can grant a full pardon of a death sentence.

In the Constitution and practice

  • Constitutional base: Article 21 (life, protected by procedure established by law), together with Articles 14 and 19 under Maneka Gandhi (1978). Articles 72 and 161 give the executive the final power of mercy.
  • Who it protects: Article 21 covers every person, citizen or not. Any foreigner facing a death sentence on Indian soil also has its protection.
  • Landmark case: Bachan Singh (1980) upheld the death penalty but limited it to the "rarest of rare" cases.
  • Related Article 21 cases:
  • Hussainara Khatoon (1979): speedy trial.
  • D.K. Basu (1997): arrest safeguards against custodial torture.
  • Rudul Sah (1983) and Nilabati Behera (1993): the State must pay compensation when it breaks Article 21.

  • These cases shape how fair the whole criminal process must be before anyone can be executed.

  • The world view:

  • The UN human rights office (OHCHR) opposes the death penalty "in all circumstances".
  • It says fair-trial standards matter most when a trial is held in absentia (the accused is not present to defend themselves) and ends in a death sentence.

  • India keeps the death penalty. So India's law and the UN's stand differ.

  • In foreign affairs: India keeps the death penalty at home. But when a person on its soil faces execution abroad, India's choices in extradition (handing over a person to another country for trial or punishment) also raise questions of the death penalty and fair trial.

Don't confuse with

  • Procedure established by law vs due process of law: the first (Article 21's words, from Japan) asks only whether a valid law and procedure exist. Due process (American) also asks whether the law itself is fair. After Maneka Gandhi (1978), India requires a "fair, just and reasonable" procedure in substance, but the text of Article 21 was not changed.
  • Passive euthanasia: this means withdrawing life support from a terminally ill patient, at the patient's own choice or under a living will (Aruna Shanbaug, 2011; Common Cause, 2018). It is not a punishment. The death penalty is a punishment the State imposes after a conviction.
  • Life imprisonment: under Bachan Singh, this is the normal sentence for the gravest crimes. Death can be given only when life imprisonment is "clearly not enough".
  • Pardon (Articles 72/161) vs judicial review: mercy is an executive power used after the courts have finished. It is not an appeal on the facts or the law.

Prelims Hooks

  • Bachan Singh (1980): the death penalty is constitutional, but only in the "rarest of rare" cases, where life imprisonment is clearly not enough.
  • Article 21 protects every person, not only citizens. The claim "Art. 21 is for citizens only" is FALSE.
  • Articles 20 and 21 can never be suspended, even in an emergency (Article 359, after the 44th Amendment, 1978).
  • Article 20(1): no one can get a heavier penalty than the law allowed when the act was done. A death sentence cannot be applied to a past act.
  • Mercy trap: only the President (Article 72) can grant a full pardon of a death sentence. A Governor (Article 161) can only suspend, remit or commute it.
  • Gopalan (1950) = any enacted procedure is enough. Maneka Gandhi (1978) = the procedure must be fair, just and reasonable. A death sentence must meet the Maneka standard.

Mains Points

  • Keep it or abolish it:
  • Those who want to keep it cite deterrence (scaring others away from crime) and justice for victims.
  • Those who want to abolish it point out that an execution cannot be undone if the court was wrong. They also note that "rarest of rare" depends heavily on each judge's view. And the OHCHR opposes the death penalty "in all circumstances".

  • A balanced answer: keep Bachan Singh's narrow gate, and work towards a uniform way of judging each case.

  • Death penalty and a fair process:

  • Article 21 after Maneka Gandhi requires a fair procedure. Slow trials (Hussainara Khatoon), custodial abuse (D.K. Basu) and trials in absentia all weaken the fairness of a death sentence.

  • The higher the punishment, the stricter the process must be.

  • Rights and foreign policy:

  • India keeps the death penalty, yet it protects every person under Article 21.
  • Extradition requests that could lead to execution test India's balance between keeping treaties, keeping good ties with neighbours, and humanitarian principles.

Read more