National Tribunals Commission
Topic: Justice Delivery: Subordinate Courts, Tribunals, Legal Aid and Judicial Reforms · NCERT: Beyond NCERT
Meaning
The National Tribunals Commission (NTC) is an independent body that selects the chairpersons and members of tribunals, checks their work and looks into complaints against them. It takes over these jobs from the "parent" ministries, which have run tribunals until now. The Supreme Court asked for it in 2020 and ordered it in November 2025. The Tribunals Reforms Bill 2026, passed by Parliament in August 2026, provides for it [1][2].
It matters because the government is the biggest litigant (the party that brings or fights the most cases) before most tribunals. If that same government picks and controls tribunal judges, it is judging its own case. The NTC is meant to break this link.
Explanation
Why the NTC was needed
- A tribunal is a body set up by law to decide disputes in one field, such as tax, service matters or company law. It works outside the regular court ladder.
- Tribunals were run by parent ministries, the same ministries whose cases they hear. Those ministries controlled the members' pay, staff and budget.
- The Court's test: if a tribunal replaces a High Court, it must be as independent as a High Court.
- Separation of powers means each branch of government keeps to its own work. Here it means judging must stay free of the executive (the government of the day).
- Vacancies were a long-running problem.
- In 2015 a Parliamentary Standing Committee proposed an NTC. It had found several tribunals not working because of vacancies [4].
- In February 2021 the Armed Forces Tribunal had 23 of 34 posts vacant and 18,829 cases pending [4].
How it is made up (Tribunals Reforms Bill 2026)
- Size: a chairperson and four members. 2 are judicial members and 2 are technical members (Clause 3(3)) [1].
- Who is eligible [1]:
- Chairperson: someone who has been a Supreme Court judge or a High Court Chief Justice.
- Judicial member: someone who has been a High Court Chief Justice or a High Court judge.
-
Technical member: someone with at least 25 years' experience in public administration, finance, law, accountancy, banking, management or technology.
-
Appointment: the Centre must consult the CJI (Chief Justice of India) before appointing the chairperson and the judicial members [1][2].
- Term: 5 years or age 70, whichever comes first [1].
- Removal: a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge nominated by the CJI must hold an inquiry before anyone is removed on misconduct-type grounds [1].
What it does
- Selection and review: it runs the selection process and performance reviews of tribunals [1][2].
- Complaints: it oversees inquiries into complaints against all tribunal members [1][2].
- Data: it builds and keeps the National Tribunals Data Grid. This is a portal holding all case information of the tribunals listed in the First Schedule of the Bill [1].
-
Selecting tribunal members, step by step (Clause 13 search-cum-selection committee) [1]: 1. The committee is formed. The NTC chairperson heads it when it picks a tribunal chairperson. An NTC judicial member heads it when it picks a tribunal member. The head has a casting vote (an extra vote that breaks a tie). 2. The other voting seats are filled. They are a retired HC Chief Justice or HC judge nominated by the NTC chair, an NTC technical member, and a Secretary to GoI nominated by the Centre. For State Administrative Tribunals, the state's Chief Secretary takes this seat. 3. Non-voting members join. These are 2 empanelled experts and the NTC Secretary, who acts as Member Secretary. 4. Candidates are assessed. For a reappointment, the committee looks at the person's past work performance. 5. The committee recommends. It sends 1 name plus 1 name on a waiting list for each vacancy. 6. The Secretariat forwards it. The recommendation goes to the Centre within 3 days. 7. The Centre appoints. It must do so within 3 months.
-
Tenure of the people it selects [1]:
- Tribunal chairperson: 5 years or age 70, whichever comes first.
- Tribunal member: 5 years or age 67, whichever comes first.
- Both can be reappointed, based on performance.
Limits: where the executive still has a hand
- Money: the NTC runs on grants from the Central Government, about ₹27.14 crore a year (₹24.79 crore recurring and ₹2.35 crore non-recurring). The money comes from the Consolidated Fund of India (the government's main account) [1].
- Staff: the NTC Secretary has the rank of Secretary to the Government of India. The Centre appoints this person, who uses the Commission's administrative and financial powers [1].
- Rules: the qualifications, pay and removal of tribunal members are left to rules made by the government ("as may be prescribed", Clause 14(1)). They are not written into the Bill itself [1].
- Coverage: the Centre can change the First Schedule, the list of tribunals the Bill covers, by notification (Clause 18(2)) [1].
- Voting: one government Secretary still votes in every selection committee [1].
In the Constitution and practice
- Constitutional base of tribunals: the 42nd Amendment (1976) added Articles 323A and 323B [4].
- Art. 323A: administrative tribunals for the service matters of public servants.
- Art. 323B: tribunals for other listed subjects, such as taxation and land reforms.
-
The NTC itself is not in the Constitution. It is a statutory body, which means it is created by an ordinary law of Parliament.
-
How the courts built up the idea:
- L. Chandra Kumar (1997): asked for one nodal ministry, the Law Ministry, to run all tribunals [4]. It also held that judicial review (the courts' power to strike down laws or actions that break the Constitution) is part of the basic structure (the core features of the Constitution that even Parliament cannot destroy).
- Madras Bar Association (2014): held that tribunals must get their support from the Law Ministry, not from the parent ministry whose cases they hear [4].
- Rojer Mathew (2019): held that short tenures give the executive control over tribunals. It asked for a single nodal agency [4].
- Madras Bar Association (November 2020): called for a National Tribunals Commission [4].
-
Madras Bar Association v. Union of India (19 November 2025; 2025 INSC 1330):
- It struck down the eligibility, appointment and tenure rules of the Tribunals Reforms Act 2021 [3].
- It ordered the Centre to set up an NTC within four months [3].
- The NTC must be free of executive control, have professional expertise, follow transparent procedures, and have oversight to build public trust [3].
-
The 2021 Act had no NTC. Under it, a search-cum-selection committee chaired by the CJI or a Supreme Court judge he nominates also had two government Secretaries. It sent a two-name panel for each post [5].
- The Tribunals Reforms Bill 2026:
- The Lok Sabha introduced and passed it on 10 August 2026. The Rajya Sabha passed it on 11 August 2026 [2].
- Its Statement of Objects says it follows MBA v. Union of India, (2026) 2 SCC 1 [1].
- Clause 24 repeals the Tribunals Reforms Act 2021 [1].
Don't confuse with
- Search-cum-selection committee: this is the panel that picks candidates for each tribunal post (Clause 13). The NTC is the permanent body that supplies the committee's head and runs the whole process [1].
- National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT): a tribunal that decides company law cases. The NTC decides no cases at all. It only selects, oversees and reviews tribunal members.
- Nodal ministry (Law Ministry): L. Chandra Kumar (1997) asked for one ministry to run all tribunals [4]. The NTC is a separate commission led by judges, not a government department.
- National Tribunals Data Grid: a case-information portal. The NTC builds and maintains it. The grid is not the Commission [1].
Prelims Hooks
- NTC make-up (2026 Bill): a chairperson (former SC judge or HC Chief Justice) and 4 members, of whom 2 are judicial and 2 technical (Clause 3(3)) [1].
- CJI's role: the Centre must consult the CJI before appointing the NTC chairperson and judicial members [1][2]. Trap: the CJI is consulted. The CJI does not appoint them.
- Timeline: a Parliamentary Standing Committee proposed an NTC (2015) → the SC called for one in MBA (Nov 2020) → the SC ordered one within 4 months in MBA (19 Nov 2025) → the 2026 Bill provided for it [4][3][1].
- Trap: in the Clause 13 committees, the 2 experts and the Member Secretary have no vote, but the government Secretary does [1].
- Selection output: 1 name + 1 on a waiting list. It is forwarded in 3 days, and the Centre must appoint within 3 months [1].
- NTC term: 5 years or age 70. It is funded by Central grants of ₹27.14 crore a year from the Consolidated Fund of India [1].
Mains Points
- Has the NTC really freed tribunals from the executive?
- Gains: the NTC is led by judges, the CJI is consulted, the tenure is 5 years with reappointment, and the 3-month deadline to appoint is mandatory [1].
- Gaps: the Centre appoints the NTC's Secretary and pays its grants. A government Secretary votes in selections. Qualifications and removal are left to rules [1].
-
Fix: give the NTC a secure budget or a Law Ministry budget line, as Chandra Kumar (1997) and MBA (2014) suggested [4].
-
Legislative override and the rule of law:
- Legislative override means Parliament passes again a rule the Court struck down, without removing the reason the Court gave.
- The 2021 Act copied provisions the Court had already struck down. This led to the November 2025 order for an NTC [3].
-
A binding judgment can be answered only by removing its basis. This is a separation of powers issue under the basic structure.
-
The test of success is fewer vacancies:
- The NTC should use the Data Grid to run performance audits and to track vacancies and pending cases [1].
- The Law Commission's 272nd Report (2017) can serve as the baseline for uniform service conditions [4].
- All tribunals should be brought under the NTC rather than left with scattered parent ministries.
Related concepts
Read more
Sources
- 1The Tribunals Reforms Bill, 2026 (Bill text, Statement of Objects, Financial Memorandum)prsindia.org · tier 1
- 2PRS Monthly Policy Review, August 2026prsindia.org · tier 1
- 3PRS Monthly Policy Review, November 2025prsindia.org · tier 1
- 4PRS, "The Tribunal System in India"prsindia.org · tier 1
- 5PRS Bill Track, The Tribunals Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Bill, 2021prsindia.org · tier 1