Shanghai Cooperation Organisation

Polity & Governance glossary

Also called: SCO · Topic: India's External Relations, 1947-1999: Non-alignment, Wars and Nuclear Policy · NCERT: Beyond NCERT

Meaning

The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) is a Eurasian group of countries. Its members, including India, China, Russia, Pakistan and the Central Asian states, work together on political, economic and security matters. India became a full member in 2017.

The SCO matters because it puts India in the same room as both China and Pakistan. Its summits give leaders a chance to hold separate one-to-one talks on the sidelines (meetings held alongside the main summit). This helped the India–China thaw after 2024.

Explanation

What kind of body it is

  • A regional grouping, not a military alliance
  • Members cooperate on politics, the economy and security.

  • Unlike NATO or the Warsaw Pact in the Cold War, members do not promise to defend each other in war.

  • Named after Shanghai, the Chinese city where it began.

  • China and Russia are its two biggest members.

  • Eurasian in reach

  • Its members cover a large part of Asia and Europe, including Central Asia.
  • India sits beside two neighbours it has fought wars with: China (1962) and Pakistan (1947-48, 1965, 1971, Kargil 1999).

How it works for India

  • Summits: leaders of member states meet regularly.
  • Sideline meetings: a summit lets two leaders meet one-to-one without a separate state visit.
  • The Modi–Xi bilateral meeting in Tianjin (August 2025) was held on the sidelines of the SCO.
  • At Tianjin, Modi said that after disengagement (both armies pulling back from points where they stood face to face) at the border, "an atmosphere of peace and stability has been established".

  • He also said the Special Representatives had reached an understanding on border management and that direct flights were being started.

  • A channel, not a judge: the SCO does not settle disputes between its members.

  • India–China border questions still go through the Special Representatives mechanism (set up in 2003).
  • India–Pakistan disputes stay bilateral under the Simla Agreement (1972).

Limits

  • Rivals inside the same club: China and Pakistan are close partners. So India cannot expect the SCO to take its side against either of them.
  • Goodwill is not a settlement: a summit meeting can lower tension, but it does not mark the LAC (Line of Actual Control, the de facto line between Indian-held and Chinese-held land, which has never been jointly marked on the ground).

  • Every "patrolling deviation" can still turn into a "face-off".

  • Easy to reverse: steps agreed around summits, like flights and pilgrimages, can be stopped again just as easily.

In the Constitution and practice

  • Constitutional base for joining such bodies
  • Foreign affairs, treaties and agreements are in the Union List (entries 10-21), so only the Union deals with them.
  • Article 73: the Union's executive power covers these subjects. So the Union government can join a grouping like the SCO by executive decision, without a separate law.
  • Article 253: Parliament can make laws to carry out treaties and international agreements, even on subjects in the State List.

  • Article 51 (a Directive Principle, so courts cannot enforce it): the state should promote international peace and security and keep "just and honourable" relations with other nations. Membership of a peace-and-security grouping fits this aim.

  • Roots in India's foreign-policy tradition

  • Non-alignment meant staying out of Cold War military blocs. It did not mean neutrality or isolation, and India took aid from both camps.
  • After the Cold War ended, this idea grew into strategic autonomy (India makes its own choices) and multi-alignment (India works with many groups at once, even rival ones).

  • Joining the SCO, which is led by China and Russia, while also working with the West is an example of multi-alignment.

  • Key instance

  • 2017: India became a full member.
  • August 2025, Tianjin: the Modi–Xi meeting on the SCO sidelines marked a move from disengagement towards normalisation.
  • The 24th round of Special Representatives talks had been held just before, in New Delhi on 19 August 2025.

Don't confuse with

  • Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): founded at Belgrade in 1961 by states that stayed out of both Cold War blocs. The SCO is a regional Eurasian grouping that includes major powers like China and Russia. It is not a movement of non-aligned states.
  • NATO / Warsaw Pact: these were Cold War military blocs whose members promised to defend each other. The SCO is not a military alliance.
  • ASEAN Regional Forum: India joined it in 1996 (verify) under the Look East Policy, which focused on South-East Asia. The SCO is centred on China, Russia and Central Asia.
  • Indo-Soviet Treaty (1971): a bilateral treaty between two countries that assured India of Soviet support if India was attacked. The SCO is a multilateral body (many countries together) and gives no such guarantee.

Prelims Hooks

  • India became a full member of the SCO in 2017. Pakistan is also a member, so "India is the only South Asian member" is FALSE.
  • The Modi–Xi bilateral of August 2025 was held in Tianjin, on the SCO sidelines. The 23rd SR round was in Beijing (December 2024), not Tianjin.
  • India's power to join such groupings is executive power under Article 73. Laws to carry out international agreements come under Article 253.
  • Trap: "The SCO is a military alliance like NATO" is FALSE.
  • Trap: "The SCO settles India–Pakistan disputes" is FALSE. The Simla Agreement (1972) keeps them bilateral.
  • Trap: "Bandung or Belgrade founded the SCO" is FALSE. Bandung (1955) led to NAM, and Belgrade (1961) founded it.

Mains Points

  • Multi-alignment in practice: India works with Russia and China in the SCO and also balances China through partnerships like the QUAD. This carries the idea of non-alignment forward into strategic autonomy. Critics ask whether India can stay credible in groups that pull in opposite directions.
  • Multilateral forums as a bridge for bilateral thaw: the Tianjin meeting shows that SCO summits can restart India–China dialogue. But the LAC is still unmarked, and each patrol can become a face-off. So the thaw should be judged by results such as fewer face-offs and steady pilgrimages and river data, not by meetings alone.
  • Limits from the China–Pakistan axis: with both China and Pakistan inside the SCO, India cannot use it to raise cross-border terrorism or Kashmir against them. India should keep the SCO as a space for dialogue and handle its core disputes through bilateral channels: the SR mechanism with China and the Simla framework with Pakistan.

Read more