Telecommunications Act 2023

Polity & Governance glossary

Also called: Telecom Act 2023 · Topic: Statutory, Regulatory and Quasi-judicial Bodies · NCERT: Beyond NCERT

Meaning

The Telecommunications Act 2023 is the law passed by Parliament that replaced the old colonial-era telegraph laws with one modern law for telecom. It covers authorisations, spectrum, right of way and universal service funding, and it amends the TRAI Act 1997.

It matters because it moved the main spectrum and authorisation powers clearly to the Central Government. That changes how much power TRAI, the independent regulator, really has.

Explanation

What the Act replaced and what it set up

  • Old system: licences issued under colonial-era laws, such as the Indian Telegraph Act.
  • New system: the Telecommunications Bill, 2023 (December 2023) replaced this old licensing structure.
  • Firms now get an authorisation (government permission to offer a service or run a network) instead of an old-style licence.

  • TRAI has made a series of recommendations under the new Act. They cover service authorisations, broadcasting authorisations, infrastructure and spectrum sharing, satellite spectrum and the numbering plan.

  • Parent law: it is the new parent law for authorisations, spectrum and right of way (permission to lay cables and put up towers on public or private land).

Spectrum: who gets it and how

  • Spectrum means the radio frequencies that carry mobile and wireless signals. It is a scarce public resource.
  • Auction is the default. Most spectrum is sold to the highest bidder.
  • Administrative assignment (given without an auction) applies to listed uses, such as defence, satellite services and BSNL/MTNL.
  • After assignment, the Centre can allow sharing, trading, leasing and surrender of spectrum, on prescribed terms and fees.
  • The Centre decides. TRAI only recommends on spectrum.

Other key parts

  • Digital Bharat Nidhi (DBN): the Act renamed the Universal Service Obligation Fund (USOF) as Digital Bharat Nidhi.
  • USOF was first set up under the Indian Telegraph (Amendment) Act, 2003, with effect from 01.04.2002.

  • DBN pays for rural connectivity, for example the Amended BharatNet Program.

  • Online dispute resolution (ODR): settling disputes fully online, without going to court.

  • The Centre may set up or approve ODR mechanisms for disputes between users and providers. Every provider must take part.

  • Using ODR does not take away a consumer's rights under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

  • Changes to the TRAI Act: the Act amends the TRAI Act 1997. One change is a new route for private-sector experts to become TRAI Chairperson.

  • Tariffs: TRAI still regulates tariffs under the 2023 framework.

Limits

  • No deadline for DoT: the Act sets no time limit for the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to act on TRAI's advice.
  • Advice is not binding: TRAI's recommendations under Section 11(1)(a) of the TRAI Act do not bind the government.

In the Constitution and practice

  • Legal base: it is an ordinary Act of Parliament. It works alongside the TRAI Act 1997, which set up TRAI as a statutory regulator.
  • Who uses it:
  • Central Government (DoT, Ministry of Communications): grants authorisations and assigns spectrum. DoT is TRAI's administrative ministry, not MeitY.
  • TRAI: makes recommendations and regulates tariffs.

  • TDSAT: settles disputes. It was created by Act No. 2 of 2000 under Section 14 of the TRAI Act.

  • How it has worked in practice:

  • Disputes: the Supreme Court restated in 2026 that settling disputes rests solely with TDSAT. TRAI only recommends, issues directions and makes regulations (2026 INSC 742).
  • Overlap with competition law: CCI v. Bharti Airtel (2018) let TRAI decide telecom-specific questions first.
  • Back-references: DoT sent back many of TRAI's recommendations under the new Act. Two examples are service authorisations and network authorisations. Network authorisations were recommended on 17.02.2025 and sent back on 03.07.2025.
  • Security exception: TRAI asked the Centre to consult it before any major change to authorisation terms, except when the change is for the security of the State.
  • Rural broadband: DBN funds the Amended BharatNet Program, which the Cabinet approved on 4 August 2023. Its outlay is ₹1,39,579 crore.

Don't confuse with

  • TRAI Act 1997: it set up the regulator (TRAI) and, after 2000, TDSAT. The Telecommunications Act 2023 is the sector's parent law for authorisations and spectrum, and it amends the TRAI Act.
  • Authorisation vs recommendation: the Centre (DoT) grants authorisations and assigns spectrum. TRAI only recommends. "TRAI allocates spectrum" is FALSE.
  • TDSAT vs ODR: TDSAT is a statutory tribunal for disputes and for appeals against TRAI orders. ODR under the 2023 Act is an online route for user–provider disputes, and it keeps Consumer Protection Act rights.
  • USOF vs Digital Bharat Nidhi: they are the same fund with a new name. USOF came from the 2003 amendment to the Telegraph Act. DBN comes from the 2023 Act.

Prelims Hooks

  • Under the Telecommunications Act 2023, spectrum is assigned by auction by default. It is assigned administratively for defence, satellite services and BSNL/MTNL.
  • The Act renamed USOF as Digital Bharat Nidhi. DBN is an attached office of DoT, not MeitY.
  • Tariff regulation stays with TRAI under the 2023 framework.
  • The Centre can allow spectrum sharing, trading, leasing and surrender, on prescribed terms and fees.
  • The Act provides for online dispute resolution. Providers must take part, and Consumer Protection Act, 2019 rights remain.
  • Trap: "The Telecommunications Act 2023 created TDSAT". FALSE. TDSAT was created by Act No. 2 of 2000, which amended the TRAI Act.

Mains Points

  • Independence of the regulator:
  • TRAI's role in spectrum is only advisory, and DoT has no deadline to act on its advice.
  • A parliamentary committee (Rajya Sabha record, 2011) said DoT should have a fixed time limit.

  • Reform: DoT should give written reasons within a fixed time whenever it rejects or changes TRAI's advice.

  • Government as referee and player:

  • The Centre owns BSNL/MTNL and gives them spectrum without an auction.
  • The same Centre has the final word on spectrum terms for their private rivals.

  • Defence and national security do justify keeping the final decision with the Centre. Even so, its reasons should be public. CAG estimated a loss of about ₹9,626 crore when TRAI's advice to auction was ignored, though DoT disputed this figure.

  • From licensing to service delivery:

  • DBN and ODR can improve last-mile results, but only if the rules are put into practice.
  • DoT should notify the ODR rules so that ODR becomes an independent step after the provider's own grievance tiers.
  • DBN money should be linked to connections people actually use, not just to infrastructure that has been built.

Read more