Three-language formula

Polity & Governance glossary

Topic: Federalism and Centre-State Relations · NCERT: Beyond NCERT

Meaning

The three-language formula is an education policy that says every school student should learn three languages. The languages are chosen so that students in Hindi-speaking states and in non-Hindi states both carry a similar load. It came from the Kothari Commission (1964–66) and was adopted in the National Policy on Education (NPE) 1968. NEP 2020 keeps it but makes it more flexible.

It matters because it is one of India's main ways of handling its many languages in schools. It also shows how language in schools, where both the Centre and the states can make policy, keeps causing Centre-state friction.

Explanation

How the original formula works (NPE 1968)

  • The aim: link Hindi and non-Hindi regions without forcing one language on everyone.
  • The "shared burden" idea: each region learns its own language, plus English, plus one language from the other side of the language divide.
Region Language 1 Language 2 Language 3
Hindi-speaking states Hindi English A modern Indian language (preferably a southern one)
Non-Hindi states Regional language Hindi English

[1]

  • So a student in Uttar Pradesh was meant to learn a language such as Tamil or Telugu. A student in Karnataka was meant to learn Hindi.

How NEP 2020 changes it

  • The formula continues, but with more flexibility. No language is imposed on any state [1].
  • Who chooses: states, regions and the students themselves pick the three languages [1].
  • The one condition: at least two of the three must be native to India [1].

  • So English can still be one of the three. It cannot be two of them along with another foreign language.

  • Medium of instruction (the language used to teach all subjects): the mother tongue or local language at least until Grade 5, and preferably until Grade 8. This applies to both public and private schools [1].

  • Sanskrit is to be offered as an option at all levels [1].

Limits and weak points

  • Uneven effort:
  • Most Hindi states did not seriously teach a South Indian language.
  • So non-Hindi students learned Hindi, but Hindi students rarely learned a southern language.

  • This weakened the "shared burden" idea.

  • Tamil Nadu never accepted it. It follows a two-language policy (Tamil and English).

  • It is a policy, not a constitutional rule. States can refuse it, which is why it depends on agreement rather than force.

In the Constitution and practice

  • Not in the Constitution itself. The formula comes from education policy (NPE 1968, NEP 2020), not from any article. It still rests on several language rules in Part XVII (Arts. 343–351):
  • Art. 343: Hindi in Devanagari is the Union's official language (the language the Central government uses for its own work). The Constitution names no "national language".
  • Art. 350A (added by the 7th Amendment, 1956): states must try to teach children from linguistic minorities (groups whose language is not the state's main language) in their mother tongue at the primary stage. NEP 2020's mother-tongue medium carries this idea further.

  • Art. 351: the Union must spread Hindi. The formula's Hindi requirement for non-Hindi states follows from this duty, but Hindi is to be promoted, not imposed.

  • Education is in the Concurrent List (subjects on which both Parliament and state legislatures can make laws). So the Centre designs the formula, but states decide how to run it.

  • Background: why the South resisted:
  • 1937–40: C. Rajagopalachari's Congress ministry in Madras made Hindi compulsory in schools. Protests by the Justice Party and Periyar forced it to withdraw the order in 1940.
  • 1965: the anti-Hindi agitation in Tamil Nadu broke out against Hindi becoming the only official language. It helped the DMK win in 1967.

  • The formula was adopted in 1968, right after this period, as a compromise in schools.

  • Recent disputes:

  • Tamil Nadu vs the Centre: Tamil Nadu rejected NEP 2020's three-language model. The dispute grew when Samagra Shiksha funds were linked to adopting NEP-related schemes.
  • Maharashtra (2025): the state ordered Hindi as the third language in primary schools. It withdrew the order after protests.

Don't confuse with

  • Official language (Art. 343): this is the language the Union government uses for its work, and it is set by the Constitution. The three-language formula is only an education policy about what students learn in school.
  • Two-language policy (Tamil Nadu): Tamil Nadu teaches only Tamil and English and has never adopted the three-language formula.
  • Medium of instruction: this is the language used to teach all subjects. Under NEP 2020 it is the mother tongue at least until Grade 5. The three-language formula is about which languages are learned as subjects.
  • Eighth Schedule: this is a constitutional list of 22 recognised languages. NEP 2020 only requires two of the three languages to be native to India. It does not say they must be from the Eighth Schedule.

Prelims Hooks

  • The formula came from the Kothari Commission (1964–66) and was adopted in NPE 1968. It is not a constitutional provision.
  • Under NPE 1968, the third language for Hindi states was a modern Indian language, preferably a southern one [1].
  • NEP 2020: at least two of the three languages must be native to India, and no language is imposed on any state [1].
  • NEP 2020: the mother tongue or local language is the medium at least until Grade 5, preferably until Grade 8, in public and private schools [1].
  • Art. 350A (mother-tongue teaching at primary level for linguistic minorities) was added by the 7th Amendment, 1956.
  • Trap: Tamil Nadu follows a two-language policy (Tamil + English) and has never accepted the three-language formula.

Mains Points

  • Shared burden that was never shared: the formula aimed to balance Hindi and non-Hindi regions. But Hindi states rarely taught a South Indian language, so in practice the extra load fell on non-Hindi students. That fed the belief in the South that the formula was a way to bring in Hindi. NEP 2020's "no imposition, two native languages" model tries to fix this by letting states choose.
  • Cooperative vs coercive federalism: education is in the Concurrent List, so the formula works only with state consent. Linking Samagra Shiksha funds to NEP schemes in Tamil Nadu, and Maharashtra's withdrawn 2025 Hindi order, show that pressure produces conflict. Agreement is what works. The lesson from India's language history (the Munshi-Ayyangar compromise, and the 1967 veto that lets any one non-Hindi state block the end of English) is that promoting Hindi ≠ imposing Hindi.
  • Mother tongue, unity and opportunity: teaching in the mother tongue (Art. 350A, NEP 2020) helps children learn and protects linguistic identity. Learning Hindi and English helps people move between states and find jobs. A balanced answer supports flexible choice for each state, real teaching of other Indian languages in Hindi states, and English as a neutral link language. It should not favour a uniform formula enforced from the Centre.

Related concepts

Read more

Sources

  1. 1National Education Policy 2020: report summary (PRS Legislative Research)prsindia.org · tier 1