BharatNet has been called the world's largest rural broadband programme, yet last-mile utilisation remains uneven. Examine how the Amended BharatNet Program seeks to address the design and O&M weaknesses of earlier phases.
BharatNet began as NOFN in 2011. Most Gram Panchayats (GPs) are now "service-ready", yet the CAG found only 33.2% of service-ready GPs actually working in November 2025 [1]. The Amended BharatNet Program (ABP) (August 2023; ₹1,39,579 crore) seeks to close this gap between access and use [2].
Weaknesses of earlier phases
- Linear design: a single fibre cut isolates a GP. Cuts cause ~48% of downtime, and repairs take 17 days on average [1].
- Power failures: 64.29% of all fault tickets [1].
- Fragmented O&M: BBNL, BSNL, RailTel, PGCIL, CSC and State agencies shared the work, so no single body owned failures. Working GPs fell from 59.63% (2021) to 27.22% (2023) after the CSC O&M contract ended [1].
- Under-utilisation: only 17.91% of bandwidth was used [1], and just 766 of one lakh GP Wi-Fi hotspots were active [4].
How ABP responds
- Design: Block-to-GP ring topology gives a redundant path [2]. For example, Maharashtra's 15,171 Phase-I GPs are being upgraded from linear to ring [3].
- Technology: IP-MPLS routers, power backup and a Remote Fibre Monitoring System for faster fault detection [2].
- O&M accountability: BSNL is the single Project Management Agency, with 10-year O&M built in [2].
- Cooperative federalism: under the State-led model, Digital Bharat Nidhi funds and State SPVs execute (e.g. MDIL, ₹10,520 crore for Maharashtra) [3].
- Demand side: connectivity reaches villages on demand [2], and the BharatNet Udyami model uses local entrepreneurs for FTTH on revenue-sharing [1].
Residual gaps
- The BSNL-dominated CPSU-led model averaged just 11.84% availability [1].
- Maharashtra already used a ring in Phase II, yet its availability stayed near zero [1]. A better design alone does not deliver uptime.
- 2025-26 spending was 75% below budget [4], so the bottleneck is the capacity to spend, not the allocation.
ABP shifts BharatNet from laying cable to running a network. Its success depends on copying what worked in Gujarat and Punjab, the only States above 95% uptime: independent power, "Call Before You Dig", uptime-linked payments and integrated Central–State NOCs [1]. If progress is measured in working, paying connections, ABP can make Digital India's promise of meaningful rural connectivity real, in line with SDG 9.c.
Sources
- 1CAG Report No. 19 of 2026, Performance Audit on BharatNet, DoT: working GPs, fibre cuts and repair time, power faults, fragmented O&M, bandwidth use, CPSU-led availability, Maharashtra ring record, Udyami model, Gujarat/Punjab practices
- 2BharatNet: Extending Internet Access, Expanding Rural Progress (PIB backgrounder, Apr 2025): ABP outlay, ring topology, IP-MPLS, RFMS, BSNL as PMA, 10-year O&M, villages on demand
- 3Agreement Signed between DBN–DoT, GoM, MDIL, BSNL & MahaIT for ABP in Maharashtra (PIB, 1 Oct 2026): State-led model, ₹10,520 crore, 15,171 GPs moving from linear to ring
- 4Demand for Grants 2026-27 Analysis: Telecommunications (PRS Legislative Research): 766 active hotspots, 75% underspend in 2025-26