·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

BharatNet has been called the world's largest rural broadband programme, yet last-mile utilisation remains uneven. Examine how the Amended BharatNet Program seeks to address the design and O&M weaknesses of earlier phases.

In this answer
  1. Weaknesses of earlier phases
  2. How ABP responds
  3. Residual gaps

BharatNet began as NOFN in 2011. Most Gram Panchayats (GPs) are now "service-ready", yet the CAG found only 33.2% of service-ready GPs actually working in November 2025 [1]. The Amended BharatNet Program (ABP) (August 2023; ₹1,39,579 crore) seeks to close this gap between access and use [2].

Weaknesses of earlier phases

  • Linear design: a single fibre cut isolates a GP. Cuts cause ~48% of downtime, and repairs take 17 days on average [1].
  • Power failures: 64.29% of all fault tickets [1].
  • Fragmented O&M: BBNL, BSNL, RailTel, PGCIL, CSC and State agencies shared the work, so no single body owned failures. Working GPs fell from 59.63% (2021) to 27.22% (2023) after the CSC O&M contract ended [1].
  • Under-utilisation: only 17.91% of bandwidth was used [1], and just 766 of one lakh GP Wi-Fi hotspots were active [4].

How ABP responds

  • Design: Block-to-GP ring topology gives a redundant path [2]. For example, Maharashtra's 15,171 Phase-I GPs are being upgraded from linear to ring [3].
  • Technology: IP-MPLS routers, power backup and a Remote Fibre Monitoring System for faster fault detection [2].
  • O&M accountability: BSNL is the single Project Management Agency, with 10-year O&M built in [2].
  • Cooperative federalism: under the State-led model, Digital Bharat Nidhi funds and State SPVs execute (e.g. MDIL, ₹10,520 crore for Maharashtra) [3].
  • Demand side: connectivity reaches villages on demand [2], and the BharatNet Udyami model uses local entrepreneurs for FTTH on revenue-sharing [1].

Residual gaps

  • The BSNL-dominated CPSU-led model averaged just 11.84% availability [1].
  • Maharashtra already used a ring in Phase II, yet its availability stayed near zero [1]. A better design alone does not deliver uptime.
  • 2025-26 spending was 75% below budget [4], so the bottleneck is the capacity to spend, not the allocation.

ABP shifts BharatNet from laying cable to running a network. Its success depends on copying what worked in Gujarat and Punjab, the only States above 95% uptime: independent power, "Call Before You Dig", uptime-linked payments and integrated Central–State NOCs [1]. If progress is measured in working, paying connections, ABP can make Digital India's promise of meaningful rural connectivity real, in line with SDG 9.c.

Sources

  1. 1CAG Report No. 19 of 2026, Performance Audit on BharatNet, DoT: working GPs, fibre cuts and repair time, power faults, fragmented O&M, bandwidth use, CPSU-led availability, Maharashtra ring record, Udyami model, Gujarat/Punjab practices
  2. 2BharatNet: Extending Internet Access, Expanding Rural Progress (PIB backgrounder, Apr 2025): ABP outlay, ring topology, IP-MPLS, RFMS, BSNL as PMA, 10-year O&M, villages on demand
  3. 3Agreement Signed between DBN–DoT, GoM, MDIL, BSNL & MahaIT for ABP in Maharashtra (PIB, 1 Oct 2026): State-led model, ₹10,520 crore, 15,171 GPs moving from linear to ring
  4. 4Demand for Grants 2026-27 Analysis: Telecommunications (PRS Legislative Research): 766 active hotspots, 75% underspend in 2025-26

More from this note